|
New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's
war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars"
defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make
the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an
application of science be successful? Is a militarized space
inevitable, necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a
new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every
Thursday.
(2811 previous messages)
rshow55
- 08:51am Jul 1, 2002 EST (#2812
of 2812)
Lchic's postings are often distinguished, and often
graceful, perceptive and deep in ways I admire, but can't match.
That's been true consistently, I think, in past weeks. I think
her postings since MD2796 rshow55
6/30/02 8:04pm . . . have been especially profound and
important.
Questions for a 4th of July discussion:
Why and how are Americans afraid? Of what? How
easily can they be silenced, intimidated? How are they couragous -
but also how are they uncourageous? In detail, both qualitatively
and quantitatively.
What has the Cold War done, and what is it still
doing, to our democracy? How are "compromises" of America's
broader principles, necessary during the Cold War, but necessary
no longer, compromising our life, liberty, and pursuit of
happiness? And endagering and degrading the lives, liberties, and
comforts of ourselves and others, as well?
MD2286 rshow55
5/18/02 5:44pm ... MD2345 rshow55
5/22/02 7:54am MD2462-3 rshow55
6/4/02 6:54am ... MD2541-44 rshow55
6/15/02 8:37am MD2661 lchic
6/22/02 12:13am ... MD2666 rshow55
6/22/02 8:45am MD2666 rshow55
6/22/02 8:45am ... MD2666 rshow55
6/22/02 8:45am MD2666 rshow55
6/22/02 8:45am ... MD2686 rshow55
6/22/02 8:39pm MD2687 rshow55
6/22/02 9:04pm ...
The things Eisenhower warned of in his FAREWELL ADDRESS of
January 17, 1961 http://www.geocities.com/~newgeneration/ikefw.htm
have happened. The subversive, cancerous patterns developed, after
much borrowing from Germany, to fight the Cold War have evolved, and
now diffused all through government, politics, and business. At the
same time, our nuclear controls have been left, almost untouched in
decisive ways, for thirty years, and we are in a new world. There
are things that need to be checked about those controls, lest the
world perish. And all over our society, there are problems that
American need to understand, and fix, with the world watching, and
checking. When we do, we'll be much better off, the world will be a
more beautiful place, and we'll almost all of us feel better about
ourselves, our country, and the world.
You can "call me Ishmael" or not, as you choose. If I'm Ishmael,
I've been at it, consistently, for a long time. Within my
limitations, I'm doing the best I can, and I'm trying to be a
patriot, too.
I'm trying to debrief, in ways consistent with my promises to
Casey, and recent promises I've made to CIA as well. There are
things that the Bush administration wants to accomplish, that are
going wrong, that would have a better chance of going right if they
knew some things I'd like to be able to communicate to them. For
reasons that are physiologically unchangeable, some of that
communication has to happen face to face - not so I can "blow
something past them" -- but so that ideas can be understood so that
they can use them.
New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Missile Defense
Enter your response, then click the POST MY MESSAGE
button below. See the quick-edit
help for more information.
|