New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's
war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars"
defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make
the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an
application of science be successful? Is a militarized space
inevitable, necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a
new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every
Thursday.
(2714 previous messages)
rshow55
- 02:20pm Jun 24, 2002 EST (#2715
of 2715)
I just walked into the office of a man I know, well versed in the
markets, in accounting, and in the virtues of honest analysis.
Unannounced. An old A.E.A. investor. Got to see his secretary. Got
his card, and will be sending him an email, phoning him, and asking
for a few minutes of his time.
Just one shot among a number.
I believe that, if only I could get something like MD2641 rshow55
6/20/02 1:00pm cleanly discussed -- which would require that
some AEA investors meet with me face to face - a lot could be sorted
out.
Because of the grammar of the situation, somebody with some
stature will have to help me out by making a phone call - shifting
an essentially automatic "no" to a "yes" .
I'm pleased to see that the market has turned a bit today.
Perhaps it ought to. Seems to me that things are getting better and
more hopeful, rather than worse.
New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Missile Defense
Enter your response, then click the POST MY MESSAGE
button below. See the quick-edit
help for more information.
|