New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's
war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars"
defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make
the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an
application of science be successful? Is a militarized space
inevitable, necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a
new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every
Thursday.
(2420 previous messages)
rshow55
- 01:46pm May 29, 2002 EST (#2421
of 2432)
Stoking the South Asian Fire http://www.nytimes.com/2002/05/29/opinion/29WED2.html
At a time when the world is pleading for
statesmanship, Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee of India and
Gen. Pervez Musharraf of Pakistan have irresponsibly escalated
threats of war.
and Russia, in close consultation with the US and other nations,
is working to defuse them:
Indian and Pakistani leaders to attend Asian
summit: MOSCOW, May 29: Indian Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee
and President Pervez Musharraf will come to the scheduled June 3-5
meeting of the Conference for Cooperation and Confidence-Building
in Asia, the Russian Foreign Ministry said. Both leaders had
expressed an interest in the offer made by Russian President
Vladimir Putin to mediate in talks to contain the crisis in the
Indian province. But Vajpayee and Musharraf were reluctant to meet
in person at the summit in Almaty, ministry spokesman Alexander
Losyukov told the Interfax news agency. (AFP) (Posted @ 14:45 PDT)
http://www.dawn.com/2002/05/29/welcome.htm
Maybe some reasonable things are being done, and reasonable
progress can be made. Looking at the "logic" of nukes - again and
again - we may find safer ways to live.
lchic
- 03:34pm May 29, 2002 EST (#2422
of 2432)
Reposting
WTO http://www.wto.org/english/info_e/site2_e.htm
http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/scm_e/scm_e.htm
http://www.wto.org/ http://www.law.duke.edu/lib/libser/publicat/researchGuides/gatt/gattframe.html
Competitive Advantage http://www.cipe.org/events/budaconf/
US-Academics/Papers http://www.cipe.org/events/budaconf/papers.php3 http://www.action-now.co.uk/competitive_advantage.htm
http://www.simplerwork.com/copy.htm
http://www.strategicmanagementscience.com/Whatis-strategic-management-science.htm#SMS
http://vig.pearsoned.com/store/coverimage/0130862711.jpg
Intellectual Capital http://www.leadertalk.com/ClipPages3/LOAS5012.html LearningOrgzn
http://www.leadertalk.com/Pages/LearnOrg.html
RU - http://www.gippsland.monash.edu.au/gbus/rusconf/abstracts.pdf
St Petersburg http://www.google.com/search?num=20&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF8&oe=UTF8&newwindow=1&q=St+Petersburg+buildings&btnG=Google+Search
rshowalt
- 05:24pm May 29, 2002 EST (#2423
of 2432)
wow Lchic! You often show how POWERFUL web links can be.
Here's the key to a 350 year old problem with coupled physical
circumstances that I was ASKED to find, under awkward circumstances
-- and which I need TITLE to, now.
MD1567 rshow55
4/20/02 4:07pm
I'm not the genius Wolfram is -- I was ASKED to find this
solution -- and now, with some things sorted out -- I think it may
be useful.
And, looking at the news, I sometimes suspect that this thread is
being useful, too.
lchic
- 10:22pm May 29, 2002 EST (#2424
of 2432)
QUOTATIONS
ON GENIUS
Here's an interesting quote from Chaplin who left the USA in the
early Fifties re Hollywood Trials ...
Man as an individual is a genius. But men in the mass
form the Headless Monster, a great, brutish idiot
that goes where prodded. Charles Chaplin The brutish idiot
being the USA publlic subjected to government propaganda!
lchic
- 05:20am May 30, 2002 EST (#2425
of 2432)
Midcourse Missile Defense Tests http://www.aviationnow.com/avnow/news/channel_military.jsp?view=story&id=news/mmda0528.xml
rshow55
- 01:04pm May 30, 2002 EST (#2426
of 2432)
http://www.aviationnow.com/avnow/news/channel_military.jsp?view=story&id=news/mmda0528.xml
"Unlike in previous tests, MDA will not release
specifics about the targets or countermeasures used in future
tests of the Ground-based Midcourse system. The agency believes it
has reached the point in the program where those details need to
be kept confidential, according to Lehner."
Will they be so confidential that the Congress will be unable to
make any determination at all about what makes sense? That's at
least likely.
You need VERY special assumptions about the MD systems disclosed
to date to make them systems that can reasonably be expected to work
under plausible tactical circumstances.
rshow55
- 01:13pm May 30, 2002 EST (#2427
of 2432)
MD84 rshow55
3/2/02 11:52am ... keys to much technical discussion on this
thread, over two years time.
(5
following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Missile Defense
|