New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's
war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars"
defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make
the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an
application of science be successful? Is a militarized space
inevitable, necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a
new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every
Thursday.
(1994 previous messages)
lchic
- 06:03am May 4, 2002 EST (#1995
of 2000)
FISK : Middle East (Ldn: Independent)
Sharon the merciless and Arafat the corrupt have nothing
meaningful to offer each other
Self-delusion has
crossed the Atlantic. George Bush is having visions again – just as
he did before the most recent bloodbath in Israel and Palestine –
and Colin Powell, whose latest Middle East mission was a wholesale
disaster, wants to devise "a set of principles" for an Arab-Israeli
peace. And, as usual, it is the occupied, not the occupier, who is
warned this is the "last chance" for peace.
That the United States wants to enlist the Europeans, Russia and
the UN in its plans for a Middle East peace conference is perhaps
the only sign of realism in the initiative. Otherwise, it's the same
old twaddle.
Yasser Arafat has to earn "trust" – this from the White House
spokesman, Ari Fleischer – and will not, for the moment, receive any
invitations to the White House. He has to curb "terror". But Ariel
Sharon, whose army was accused of war crimes in Jenin by Human
Rights Watch yesterday, will be joshing with Mr Bush in Washington
next week.
It was impossible, in Jerusalem yesterday, to take any of this
seriously.
Mr Arafat had just emerged from his Ramallah headquarters to call
the Israelis "Nazis" while Mr Sharon, only two days earlier, had
announced that Netzarim, the illegal Jewish settlement in the
Palestinian Gaza Strip, was the same as Tel Aviv. Since Mr Sharon
came to power, no fewer than 34 new settlements or outposts for
Jews, and Jews only, on Arab land, have been constructed.
A glance at the events of the past 24 hours shows just how far
the Bush administration has strayed from reality. For days, the US
President demanded that Israel withdraw its troops from West Bank
cities. Mr Sharon simply ignored him. "When I say withdraw, I mean
it," Mr Bush snapped at one point. Mr Sharon ignored him.
Yesterday, as Mr Powell warned Mr Arafat that it was his "last
chance" to show his leadership, the Israeli Prime Minister was
sending an armoured column to re-invade the Palestinian city of
Nablus for the second time in two weeks. There was to be no "last
chance" for Mr Sharon; only for the iniquitous Mr Arafat.
And what on earth, one wondered, was the point in parading the UN
secretary general, Kofi Annan, alongside Mr Powell on Thursday
night? The UN Security Council resolution calling for an Israeli
withdrawal from Palestinian Authority areas of the West Bank –
supported by the United States – is still being flagrantly ignored
by Israel. Only a day earlier, Mr Annan was forced, in utter
humiliation, to disband his fact-finding mission to Jenin after
Israel refused to accept it. So what was his presence supposed to
mean? The impotent secretary general just stood next to the equally
impotent US Secretary of State.
The squalid, corrupt little dictator of Ramallah, Mr Arafat, and
the brutal, merciless leader of the Middle East's mightiest army, Mr
Sharon, have nothing to offer each other. Mr Arafat cannot fulfil
his required role of colonial governor – to "control his own people"
– while Mr Sharon cannot fulfil his promise to provide Israelis with
security. As one of his legal advisers admitted hours after
Washington's call for a peace conference, the diminution in
Palestinian violence "won't last for ever".
Never, since the end of the 1991 Gulf War, have Israelis and
Palestinians been so far apart. So what possible inducements can
Washington extend to either side? If Mr Arafat wants an end to
occupation and to settlements on Palestinian land, and a capital in
east Jerusalem, Mr Sharon will not oblige. If Mr Sharon wants to go
on building settlements and maintaining the occupation and claiming
all of Jerusalem as the "eternal and unified capital of Israel", Mr
Arafat will not oblige.
Meanwhile, the Americans blissfully hope that Mr Bush's "visions"
– of Israeli and Palestinian states happily co-existing side by side
– will survive
lchic
- 06:05am May 4, 2002 EST (#1996
of 2000)
..... side by side – will survive the next two months. How is
this possible? It is only a matter of time before the next vicious
Palestinian suicide bomber blows up himself or herself in an Israeli
city. And thus only a matter of time before Israel smashes its way
into West Bank cities all over again.
In fact, Israel doesn't need an excuse to do this any more.
Yesterday's thrust into Nablus was another precedent. Far from
being a retaliation, Israel did not invade Palestinian territory in
response to Palestinian attacks. It said it had entered Nablus to
prevent "future" attacks. Needless to say, the nature of this
precedent went unreported.
So we are back to the "last chance". But "last chance" for what?
If Mr Arafat does not earn that all-purpose American "trust", what
is supposed to happen? Is he to be liquidated? Will the Americans
choose another Palestinian leader? Or will they just let the
Israelis build more settlements (something the Israelis are doing
anyway) and abandon the "visions" and walk away from the
Palestinians, leaving them to the mercy of Mr Sharon and his dreams
of a Greater Israel?
lchic
- 07:30am May 4, 2002 EST (#1997
of 2000)
Mr Sergunin (Chechnya's Deputy Prime Minister) acknowledged that
sometimes "representatives of law enforcement agencies fail to give
reasons for their actions". http://news.independent.co.uk/europe/story.jsp?story=291722
lchic
- 07:35am May 4, 2002 EST (#1998
of 2000)
BAN - cartoons http://www.loc.gov/rr/print/swann/herblock/ticktock.html
(2
following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Missile Defense
|