New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's
war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars"
defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make
the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an
application of science be successful? Is a militarized space
inevitable, necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a
new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every
Thursday.
(1520 previous messages)
almarst-2001
- 11:16pm Apr 18, 2002 EST (#1521
of 1566)
President Bush yesterday sidestepped questions about whether
his administration had been slow to condemn last week's aborted coup
in Venezuela, saying it was important that President Hugo Chavez
learned some lessons about democracy from the attempt to oust him. -
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A12049-2002Apr18.html
A lesson in the "Classic Logic";)
almarst-2001
- 11:26pm Apr 18, 2002 EST (#1522
of 1566)
Washington is setting the scene for the remaking of a Latin
American epic. The story will bring back the theme of U.S.
engagement in a war against insurgents, which for years was a
practically forbidden topic. That changed when Colombia ended peace
talks and declared all-out war against one of the most powerful
rebel groups in the world, the Revolutionary Armed Forces of
Colombia (FARC).
This latest adaptation will be a timely one. Look for
"counter-terrorism" to be the new buzzword in the script, replacing
"counter-insurgency" that never enjoyed rave reviews anyway. All the
pieces are there for a significant drama. But it may turn out to be
one of little consequence.
Some of the old players who helped swat communism out of Central
America in the 80s are back in town to assume leading roles under
the Bush administration. Others who played significant roles never
left, instead using their talents to ensure that any new pitch for
international military support wouldn't look too much like the old
"counter-insurgency". - http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A1950-2002Apr5.html
lchic
- 12:56am Apr 19, 2002 EST (#1523
of 1566) USA - Jenin - Transparency --- really?!!
Classical Logic - suggests that when the name of the reporter
is 'ass ... then there IS a really big problem! http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=153511&contrassID=2&subContrassID=3&sbSubContrassID=0&listSrc=Y
lchic
- 01:02am Apr 19, 2002 EST (#1524
of 1566) USA - Jenin - Transparency --- really?!!
Classical Logic also apparently says that when Palestine can
not call in an international team to protect the population ....
without first having to get approval from the USA ... then
Classical Logic suggests that the USA has had a duty of care to
protect the people of Jenin all along.
Why don't the Jenin people go to an international court with a
dollar claim re the loss of lives, breadwinners, homes,
infrastructure ... etc etc etc .. and start a class action to get
necessary recompense from the Whitehouse/Congress re their failure
to exercise and protect Jenin people from the Mad Evil Logic of
Masters Bush-Sharon ...
Speilburg .. did he get over to Jenin and start to document this
holocust?!
lchic
- 01:07am Apr 19, 2002 EST (#1525
of 1566) USA - Jenin - Transparency --- really?!!
Scientific point
.. how can ordinary people protect themselves from the
evil-minded political schemers of the world!
Remembering that these self-same politicians have nukes ... now
there is a scary thought ...
Looking at the Afghan-shooting of Canadians recently ... there
seems to have been a failure of communication from base to pilot
which need only have been 'OUR GUYS are in a training session below
you' -- simple .. yet seemingly far too complex!
lchic
- 01:34am Apr 19, 2002 EST (#1526
of 1566) USA - Jenin - Transparency --- really?!!
"(The EU) finds the reports of the events which happened at
the Jenin camp very alarming. If they are confirmed, they will
have very serious consequences," the EU said in a statement from
Madrid, which currently holds the presidency of the 15-nation
bloc. It did not go into details.
Serious consequences or is the EU a toothless tiger?
lchic
- 01:38am Apr 19, 2002 EST (#1527
of 1566) USA - Jenin - Transparency --- really?!!
There is no question that:
IDF fired missiles from helicopters into a heavily populated
civilian area (killing innocent civilians)
IDF fired tank rounds in a heavily populated civilian area
(killing innocent civlians)
IDF snipers killed innocent civilians on numerous occasions
IDF deliberately destroyed water and electrical supplies
IDF deliberately denied food, water, medicine supplies from being
provided to innocent civilians
IDF denied the evacuation or medical treatment for the wounded
innocent civilians
IDF kept the innocent civilian population under a total state of
seige for over two weeks
IDF , from eyewitness accounts executed civilians
IDF executed fighter suspects who had surrendered
IDF brutalized and tortured civilians detained.
IDF invaded and destroyed innocent people homes
IDF stole valuables and destroyed innocent civilian's property.
IDF killed innocent civilians by demolishing their houses with
the people still in them
IDF destroyed civilian infrastructure for punitive purposes only
IDF destroyed civil institutions, civil records, educational
records
IDF used innocent civilians as human shields
THESE ARE WAR CRIMES !
Says LiberalinCalif - 06:14am Apr 19, 2002 BST (#204 of 205)
Guardian International
(39
following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Missile Defense
|