New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Russian military leaders have expressed concern about US plans
for a national missile defense system. Will defense technology be
limited by possibilities for a strategic imbalance? Is this just SDI
all over again?
(9381 previous messages)
lunarchick
- 10:46am Sep 18, 2001 EST (#9382
of 9408) lunarchick@www.com
Nite Shols! Not gone out shopping for patriotic FlagMobelia have
you?
rshowalter
- 10:52am Sep 18, 2001 EST (#9383
of 9408) Robert Showalter
showalte@macc.wisc.edu
No, but I'm flying a flag from my porch.
Proudly.
And with concern.
logician3
- 11:52am Sep 18, 2001 EST (#9384
of 9408) Bush is an idiot.
The reason we might be having a little trouble getting global
cooperation in this affair is that we are seen as the world’s
ultimate hypocrites. We have stood by day after day and year after
year while terrorist acts have been committed elsewhere in the
world, and mainly just sent out condolences. The latest round of
terrorism in Israel has largely been ignored by Bush, in his
“hands-off” policy regarding Israel and the Palestinians.
Now that we have been hit hard, suddenly the world
MUST be mobilized against terrorism, like it just started
happening.
Maybe the world does need to have a change in attitude towards
terrorism, but we need also to have a change in attitude towards the
rest of the world.
almarst-2001
- 03:01pm Sep 18, 2001 EST (#9385
of 9408)
Hijackers connected to Albanian terrorist cell - http://www.washtimes.com/national/20010918-91529452.htm
Why am I not surprised?
almarst-2001
- 03:47pm Sep 18, 2001 EST (#9386
of 9408)
"For the past two decades or more, the United States has
marked the course of its history through choices made in a fog of
propaganda." - http://www.consortiumnews.com/2001/091701a.html
rshowalter
- 04:37pm Sep 18, 2001 EST (#9387
of 9408) Robert Showalter
showalte@macc.wisc.edu
Yes, almarst (and not just the United States, either).
Part of the problem is a logical one -- we seem to find
some basic facts "unthinkable" -- and so propaganda misleads us much
more than it otherwise would.
And American propagandists, like some others in history, have
been very skilled.
rshowalter
- 04:38pm Sep 18, 2001 EST (#9388
of 9408) Robert Showalter
showalte@macc.wisc.edu
We, as a species, are beautiful --- Of Altruism, Heroism and
Evolution's Gifts in the Face of Terror By NATALIE ANGIER http://www.nytimes.com/2001/09/18/health/psychology/18ALTR.html
MD9299 rshowalter
9/17/01 3:38pm ... MD9300 rshowalter
9/17/01 3:41pm MD9301 rshowalter
9/17/01 3:41pm ... MD9302 rshowalter
9/17/01 3:47pm
The article discusses beautiful, powerful things, and includes an
acknowledgement that conflict and horror exist, too. Angier quotes
Dr. Wilson of SUNY:
" "Yet he does not see conflict as inevitable.
"It's been shown pretty well that where people place the boundary
between us and them is extremely flexible and strategic," he said.
"It's possible to widen the moral circle, and I'm optimistic
enough to believe it can be done on a worldwide scale."
I've asked, how, as a matter of mechanics, can it be
" possible to widen the moral circle" . . to
shift o "the boundary between us and them" in workable ways
that permit more "win-win" situations, and less horror?
" How can "widening the moral circle" be done,
consistently enough, predictably enough, on the personal levels
where it has to happen, so that the widening works on a worldwide
scale?
We have to try to find answers that are workable, and to do so,
we need to see that people are complex, and though there may be
tension, there is no contradiction between man in his
kindness to "his own kind" and man's cruelty to
"others."
Once one accepts that these seemingly opposite aspects of
human behavior are not contradictory, with people as complex as they
are, there is more hope of sorting some conflicts out that may be
literally unthinkable otherwise.
The following quote haunts me, both for what it says, and for its
incompleteness.
(20
following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Missile Defense
|