New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Russian military leaders have expressed concern about US plans
for a national missile defense system. Will defense technology be
limited by possibilities for a strategic imbalance? Is this just SDI
all over again?
(9211 previous messages)
rshowalter
- 06:28pm Sep 16, 2001 EST (#9212
of 9229) Robert Showalter
showalte@macc.wisc.edu
I've often wondered if they were criminally insane - - - but
that's just evidence of a "paradigm conflict" -- and I might, after
all, be wrong.
But I'm not alone in my concerns. And somebody's wrong -
-- on matters of life and death.
I listened to Richard Perle on TV today, as well, and was
unimpressed by his stances, and the fact that a President of the
United States seems to trust him.
lunarchick
- 06:29pm Sep 16, 2001 EST (#9213
of 9229) lunarchick@www.com
Richard Perle .... his eminence hasn't captured the world - never
heard of the guy - who is he?
lunarchick
- 06:32pm Sep 16, 2001 EST (#9214
of 9229) lunarchick@www.com
http://www.clw.org/nmd/bmdoppositionlist.html
lunarchick
- 06:34pm Sep 16, 2001 EST (#9215
of 9229) lunarchick@www.com
Richard N. Perle, Assistant Secretary of Defense under President
Reagan
lunarchick
- 06:36pm Sep 16, 2001 EST (#9216
of 9229) lunarchick@www.com
Reading Pilger, i noted his statement re William CASEY ... the
CIA running government during the time of Regan.
Perhaps this was a necessity. Wasn't the President brain injured.
Did Casey a job -- how did he fare?
rshowalter
- 06:37pm Sep 16, 2001 EST (#9217
of 9229) Robert Showalter
showalte@macc.wisc.edu
He's one many academics that the far right wing has endowed for a
lifetime -- a superb way to subvert the academy, as it is. Insofar
as I've paid attention to him, my impression is that he can be
counted on to find excuses for any agressive conduct whatsoever,
just so long as it is the United States that does it.
His background, and manner of endowment, is not very different
from the endowment of Condoleezza Rice .
In the 30's it was amazing how easily the NAZI's could get
ornate, eloquent, academic support. All they had to do was pay for
it. The patterns of right wing support for academicians here in the
US look much the same, and I don't personally think there's any
accident about that.
lunarchick
- 06:37pm Sep 16, 2001 EST (#9218
of 9229) lunarchick@www.com
Reading Pilger, i noted his statement re William CASEY ... the
CIA running government during the time of Regan.
Perhaps this was a necessity. Wasn't the President brain injured.
Casey did a job -- how did he fare -- was he careful in the
international sense?
lunarchick
- 06:40pm Sep 16, 2001 EST (#9219
of 9229) lunarchick@www.com
Recalling ... wasn't the Regan problem one of excessive
expenditure, monitarism, Regan_Thatcherite economics .. deference to
the right ... failure to have social issues as policy.
lunarchick
- 06:43pm Sep 16, 2001 EST (#9220
of 9229) lunarchick@www.com
Who is the current Casey equivalent in the Washington scene?
rshowalter
- 06:46pm Sep 16, 2001 EST (#9221
of 9229) Robert Showalter
showalte@macc.wisc.edu
lunarchick
9/16/01 6:36pm
I'm not sure there's anybody in the administration as good
as Casey, in some crucial ways.
My background is unusual. It is a source of both insight and
difficulties for myself and people who have to deal with me.
Writings connecting me to Bill Casey:
MD6057 rshowalter
6/26/01 7:22am
MD6370-71 rshowalter
7/1/01 7:19am
My technical background and orientation:
MD6397-99 rshowalter
7/2/01 8:00am
I'm trying, with enormous and distinguished help from Dawn Riley,
within the limits of my strength and resources, to get some facts
checked.
Minds are opening to the possiblility that the US may be
fallible. Outside the US, and in America, as well. I take that as a
good sign, for the sake of the world, and the United States itself.
. . . . . Pollution deal leaves US cold by Charles Clover in
Bonn http://portal.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2001/07/24/wkyot24.xml
" Margot Wallstrom, the European environment
commissioner, said: "We can go home and look our children in the
eyes. Something has changed in the balance of power between the
United States and the EU."
The administration is doing and saying some crazy, inconsistent
things. In times of paradigm crisis, that sort of thing happens, and
can be a healthy sign. . . . MD6012-3 rshowalter
6/25/01 4:04pm
In times where basic ideas have to be rethought - a crucial stage
occurs when a group of people organize who do not believe the old
view.
" The head of the American delegation, Paula
Dobriansky, was booed by ministers and officials when she said:
"The Bush administration takes the issue of climate change very
seriously and we will not abdicate our responsibilities."
Perhaps a time is coming where it will be possible to get some
key things checked. A tragedy has occurred, which ought to make
people want right answers.
Our safety depends on them.
(8
following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Missile Defense
|