New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Russian military leaders have expressed concern about US plans
for a national missile defense system. Will defense technology be
limited by possibilities for a strategic imbalance? Is this just SDI
all over again?
(9051 previous messages)
rshowalter
- 01:48pm Sep 14, 2001 EST (#9052
of 9061) Robert Showalter
showalte@macc.wisc.edu
A community that ought not to tolerate acts of terrorism, from
any source, and that should have the competence, will, decency, and
strength to prevent them.
There are signs that such a community is coming into being - -
and it faces challenges which may cause more convergence to a
workable community now.
lunarchick
- 02:00pm Sep 14, 2001 EST (#9053
of 9061) lunarchick@www.com
Australian public opinion [ http://www.abc.net.au/rn/talks/austback/index/default.htm
]
Quote: 'the military mind sees the solution of all problems as
the military solution' usa's G Douglas "As for God Bless
America - if I hear that again i'll puke. What the Americans need is
someone to take the blindfold off their eyes"
'Digging for facts is better than leaping to conclusions'
'Cause and Effect : Americans i've met are totally ashamed
of the Bwsh Government'
'Americans are 'hot heads' under Bwsh'
'Bwsh being there is the cause of the problem'
'Third worlders die everyday and no one blinks'
'No world war three - thank you!'
rshowalter
- 02:07pm Sep 14, 2001 EST (#9054
of 9061) Robert Showalter
showalte@macc.wisc.edu
There was a prayer service, today, and I'd like to cite some
reasons for concern that are both religious and secular. MD776
rshowalter
2/24/01 9:17am ... MD777 rshowalter
2/24/01 9:25am http://www.wisc.edu/rshowalt/sermon.html
MD803 rshowalter
2/28/01 9:39pm http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2000/democracy/nuclear/stories/nukes/index.html
We neen to know how others feel, and why MD1274-1279 almarst-2001
3/21/01 7:41pm
MD9044 almarst-2001
9/14/01 1:08pm
lunarchick
- 02:10pm Sep 14, 2001 EST (#9055
of 9061) lunarchick@www.com
Re 'hot heads' rushing headlong into things that haven't been
fully considered.
The point here is that Bwsh from the Bush family of
opportunism is grasping this as an opportunity to invoke a
President's ability to go to war - followed blindly by boot-licking
nations such as Australia.
So, the world can quite suddenly 'be at war' .. without reference
whatsoever to the WILL OF THE PEOPLE of those countries.
America should look carefully at the Powers of the President when
at war ... that's why the 'war' word was used so quickly.
Sunday will see rallies here as people come out on the streets to
campaigne against Howard Prime Minister embracing Bwsh too closely.
lunarchick
- 02:22pm Sep 14, 2001 EST (#9056
of 9061) lunarchick@www.com
Can Americans explain why the planes that were hi-jacked weren't
shot down ?
How come America say they can hit a missile (with a homing beacon
on it) over the pacific ... travelling at fast speed ... when they
are incapable of stopping a hi-jacked plane, a hi-jacked plane, a
hi-jacked plane when it is pointing into a city of high density
population and known to be way off course.
Recall Bwsh was beating drums looking for rogues .. leading to:
China bringing the regular routed spy plane down, as a lesson
to bring the hot-headed president to earth - + insisting on plane
being dismantled prior to dispatch
The rest of the world made alliances to counteract the failure
of government by the hi-jack president - ballot fiasco
General discusssions on international boards have noted that
the greatest threats aren't MD rather the bomb in the suitcase
(asymmetry) Bwsh is incompetent, rather than get into WWIII, he
should look at the number of people he allowed to die on Tuesday,
and as a mark of respect to their memories - resign!
rshowalter
- 02:26pm Sep 14, 2001 EST (#9057
of 9061) Robert Showalter
showalte@macc.wisc.edu
HOW TO SEARCH THE "MISSILE DEFENSE" FORUM
gisterme and I disagree on some things, but he's recently
joined me in asking that the search function be reinstated.
That would be useful, because the thread has been set up as a
format for communication and consideration of a complex, vital issue
by staffed organizations. I think that the chances for peace,
and good decision, would be facilititated if staffed organizations
looked at it.
The thread, which now fills 25 1 1/2' notebooks of text, and
accesses by links perhaps 3-4 times more text, is set up as an
"associative memory" --with enough detail for closure. It has, I
believe, gotten results.
To search the thread:
1. Pull down the entries to the thread, an html at a time, and
store on disk so that it can be searched by one of several common
search utilities. (For speed of searching, dividing into
seperate files for each 1000 postings helps.)
2. Search by key words, or by citation numbers, and store the
searches in a way that can be acessable. Many can be used as guides
to further searching, and as these searches accumulate they serve to
organize the ideas of the thread into a seperate corpus that can
itself be searched.
3. The html's linked in a given posting can themselves be
stored inside the "folder" that each html is filed with.
With disk storage and CD ROM storage as convenient as it is, this
is a searchable corpus.
I believe that the similarities between the searching of this
corpus, and the searching of human associative memory, are basic,
and built into the logic of classification itself.
If that's true, that may be one reason, among a number, why this
corpus, and corpuses like it, may facilitate "meetings of the
mind."
(4
following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Missile Defense
|