New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Russian military leaders have expressed concern about US plans
for a national missile defense system. Will defense technology be
limited by possibilities for a strategic imbalance? Is this just SDI
all over again?
(8879 previous messages)
rshowalter
- 06:08pm Sep 12, 2001 EST (#8880
of 8905) Robert Showalter
showalte@macc.wisc.edu
almarst , I happen to think you have a very respectable
position there.
Some terrorists have said the same -- and their argument is - -
" since the United States acts as it does, and
threatens as it does, we can do anything.
It is a terrible argument - - but in terms of logic and
proportion, has some things to be said for it.
We need to take away the intellectual and religious justification
for terrorism that is actually used - - which is justification in
terms of the stances of the United States - - by getting rid of
nukes. Or, at least, reducing them a helluva a lot.
The US would be better defended, and safer, without them, and so
would everybody else in the world.
rshowalter
- 06:11pm Sep 12, 2001 EST (#8881
of 8905) Robert Showalter
showalte@macc.wisc.edu
I think people should read the all-day discussion I had
with "becq" on September 25 2000 (who I believed at the time
was Bill Clinton) and see how matter-of-factly he acknowledged the
role of nuclear threats in US diplomacy.
rshowalter
- 06:16pm Sep 12, 2001 EST (#8882
of 8905) Robert Showalter
showalte@macc.wisc.edu
That day started with a proposal from me MD266-269 rshowalt
9/25/00 7:32am
went on all day, included this:
" Quite true thats why America makes it quite
clear and indicates that it will use nuclear weapons if it feels
it needs to. " MD301 beckq
9/25/00 5:03pm
and ended with an offer from me that still stands MD304 rshowalt
9/25/00 5:28pm
rshowalter
- 06:18pm Sep 12, 2001 EST (#8883
of 8905) Robert Showalter
showalte@macc.wisc.edu
It was an unapologetic terrorist stance.
In almarst's terms, and in mine.
If we changed our stance, we'd have a much better chance of
controlling all other forms of terrorism.
rshowalter
- 06:21pm Sep 12, 2001 EST (#8884
of 8905) Robert Showalter
showalte@macc.wisc.edu
I am very strongly for condemning and eliminating terrorism.
In all its forms.
A big thing the world has to do is become more like a
community , and less like a Hobbesian gaggle, engaged in a
war-of-all-against-all.
To a quite encouraging degree, I think there have been steps in
that direction in the last few months.
rshowalter
- 06:24pm Sep 12, 2001 EST (#8885
of 8905) Robert Showalter
showalte@macc.wisc.edu
gisterme
9/12/01 6:02pm , when did I ever say that our "free
society" --- especially the free parts, wasn't worth fighting for?
Never did.
I don't always like you either - - it seems to me that, quite
often, you drag red herrings across the dialog, just to close off
conversation whenever you feel you or your colleagues need to pull a
fast one, usually for private profit, to the disadvantage of the
United States and our allies.
rshowalter
- 06:34pm Sep 12, 2001 EST (#8886
of 8905) Robert Showalter
showalte@macc.wisc.edu
Talk about insulting the memory of our fighting men who lost
thier lives, and insulting the men who fight today . . . . look at
this:
. Elder Bush in Big GOP Cast Toiling for Top
Equity Firm by LESLIE WAYNE http://www.nytimes.com/2001/03/05/politics/05CARL.html
Don't you think soldiers have reason to be ashamed of that sort
of thing?
rshowalter
- 06:46pm Sep 12, 2001 EST (#8887
of 8905) Robert Showalter
showalte@macc.wisc.edu
I'm working to defend and protect the reasonable
interests of the United States.
Not interests that cannot stand the light of day, held by a small
group that has, long ago, forgotten both about its job and its
responsibilities.
MD8246 rshowalter
8/30/01 3:05pm ...contains many links about what this thread is
built to do, and what it has done.
MD8258 rshowalter
8/31/01 8:10am ... MD8259 rshowalter
8/31/01 8:16am MD8260 rshowalter
8/31/01 8:55am ...
(18
following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Missile Defense
|