New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Russian military leaders have expressed concern about US plans
for a national missile defense system. Will defense technology be
limited by possibilities for a strategic imbalance? Is this just SDI
all over again?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/89b28/89b2890049597f4589a36476018b5f5a3e0e3cea" alt="Earliest Messages" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e59fc/e59fc27655b603ce67690bb11228c8684b418a94" alt="Previous Messages" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43930/4393063eda20c1c3e123e066bd93306b1f73a4ea" alt="Recent Messages" (8737 previous messages)
rshowalter
- 12:53pm Sep 10, 2001 EST (#8738
of 8742) data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ae9e7/ae9e7f91434510497421271fe07297fb7ca6a1dd" alt="Delete Message" Robert Showalter
showalte@macc.wisc.edu
I take religlious matters, including ideas about religious
causation, quite seriously. But I take practical matter
seriously, and on the issues involved with this thread, see no
contradictions.
I've written about issues of morality, which I think are
essential for decent and practical action, on this thread for
a long time, and on the Guardian Talk threads as well.
MD816 rshowalter
3/1/01 4:25pm ... MD817 rshowalter
3/1/01 4:27pm MD818 rshowalter
3/1/01 4:32pm ...
MD2203 lunarchick
4/13/01 9:24am ... MD2204 lunarchick
4/13/01 9:28am MD2205 lunarchick
4/13/01 9:30am ... MD2206 lunarchick
4/13/01 9:35am
MD4157 rshowalter
5/22/01 3:13pm .... MD4158 rshowalter
5/22/01 3:29pm MD4159 rshowalter
5/22/01 5:20pm ...
Now, I've had some personal background that I've tried to be
clear about, and asked people to check, and it is consistent with
either an entirely secular or a quite religious view. I don't think
the right answers, for me, at the level of action, depend much on
whether I'm considering things in terms of religious belief, or in
secular terms. And I don't feel that the right answers for other
people depend much on that either.
MD6057 rshowalter
6/26/01 7:22am
MD6370 rshowalter
7/1/01 7:19am ... MD6371 rshowalter
7/1/01 7:19am
MD6397 rshowalter
7/2/01 8:00am ... MD6398 rshowalter
7/2/01 8:00am MD6399 rshowalter
7/2/01 8:02am ... MD6400 rshowalter
7/2/01 8:02am
MD7385 rshowalter
7/24/01 8:13pm ... MD7386 rshowalter
7/24/01 8:14pm MD7388 rshowalter
7/24/01 8:17pm ... MD7389 rshowalter
7/24/01 8:18pm MD7390 rshowalter
7/24/01 8:20pm ...
These experiences do give me a strong sense of duty
, and a sense, that I think many people would appreciate, of a
calling on the subject matter of this board -- which is
getting rid of nuclear weapons, and getting to a more workable and
productive peace -- with missile defense one issue among a number of
fundamentally coupled issues.
When I was routed to this board by "kate_nyt" , my
interest in nuclear disarmament was not in question, and was made
clear from my first postings MD266 rshowalt
9/25/00 7:32am ... MD267 rshowalt
9/25/00 7:33am MD268 rshowalt
9/25/00 7:35am ... MD269 rshowalt
9/25/00 7:36am on that day to an offer that still stands
MD304 rshowalt
9/25/00 5:28pm
I think there's a significant chance of the world ending because
of people like you gisterme , and that seems to me to be
sufficient motivation to work on this board, backslider and doubter
though I am. From an entirely secular point of view, it seems a good
reason to me.
rshowalter
- 12:54pm Sep 10, 2001 EST (#8739
of 8742) data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ae9e7/ae9e7f91434510497421271fe07297fb7ca6a1dd" alt="Delete Message" Robert Showalter
showalte@macc.wisc.edu
My own view is that I'm doing just exactly what Bill Casey
told me to do, and that, to an extent that I sometimes find
surprising, it seems to be working.
rshowalter
- 12:56pm Sep 10, 2001 EST (#8740
of 8742) data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ae9e7/ae9e7f91434510497421271fe07297fb7ca6a1dd" alt="Delete Message" Robert Showalter
showalte@macc.wisc.edu
I believe that Dawn and I are delivering "good news." Which
productive professionals, after hard work, are expected to do. The
good news (and warnings) includes these things:
Some issues involving the interface between
physical modeling and math.
New techniques and insights that make it possible
to "talk to the Russians" at a level that wasn't possible before,
and to adress, define, and focus problems more than before. So
that people have a chance of solving problems that were insoluble
before, that can now be solved by hard work.
Explanations of how to address paradigm
conflict , a very serous problem
The importance of understanding details if
"the golden rule" is to be practical and operational, especially
under difficult circumstances.
and
A basic insight about how people function
in groups, set out in the first pages of Mankind's Inhumanity
to Man and Woman - As natural as human goodness? http://talk.guardianunlimited.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7b085/0
that I believe is essential if people are to more
effectively adress problems of complex cooperation, and the
avoidance of explosive fights.
(2
following messages)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9cb71/9cb71bb3e17160b6a68b4f8ab591d89dd7e68f05" alt="Read Subscriptions" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f06e/1f06ef5e04105be934201f224c744269d34c90ab" alt="Cancel Subscriptions" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79a7e/79a7e3edae2f3b9514d445fa978507db265d2419" alt="Post Message"
New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Missile Defense
|