New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Russian military leaders have expressed concern about US plans
for a national missile defense system. Will defense technology be
limited by possibilities for a strategic imbalance? Is this just SDI
all over again?
(8378 previous messages)
rshowalter
- 08:31am Sep 3, 2001 EST (#8379
of 8382) Robert Showalter
showalte@macc.wisc.edu
When we "encourage" nukes, in any way, we are encouraging
instruments built to produce terrible, utterly indefensible war
crimes. MD6514 rshowalter
7/3/01 5:55pm
The Cold War ought to be over -- not perpetuated, without limit,
by people who have, often, very dubious histories, and who use
power, very often, in ways that cannot stand the light of day.
MD8246 rshowalter
8/30/01 3:05pm
rshowalter
- 09:30am Sep 3, 2001 EST (#8380
of 8382) Robert Showalter
showalte@macc.wisc.edu
Superb piece by Tyler and, it seems to me, a near-optimal stance
for Putin, in the interests of Russia, and the world as a whole, and
the United States as well.
Putin, Sizing Up Bush, Says the Retinue 'Makes the King'
by PATRICK E. TYLER http://www.nytimes.com/2001/09/03/international/europe/03RUSS.html
Putin, Sizing Up Bush, Says the Retinue 'Makes the King'
"MOSCOW, Sept. 2 — President Vladimir V. Putin said this
weekend that he believes that George W. Bush has a strong reliance
on a powerful circle of aides, but that this circle is still
struggling over its priorities, especially in regard to the 1972
Antiballistic Missile Treaty.
"In an interview with a Finnish newspaper held Saturday before
Mr. Putin's departure for Finland today, the Russian leader was
asked to evaluate the first seven months of the Bush administration.
He said he found his American counterpart "a comfortable and
substantive partner," but at the same time added that he had come to
believe in the "correctness of the expression that it is the
retinue" of aides "that makes the king."
""Of course, it is he who makes the final decision," Mr. Putin
added, according to a transcript of the interview issued by his
press service, "but we have a feeling that his team has not
determined some priorities yet."
"Only when they do, he added, "will our dialogue take on a
substantive character."
"The Russian leader seemed to confer a negative judgment on
the quality of consultations that have been under way since the two
leaders met in Slovenia and Genoa this summer. Moreover, his remarks
indicated that Russian officials sense that the debate in Washington
over how to proceed with missile defense is still under way and may
undergo further change as the White House contemplates a battle in
Congress over funding for a $60 billion project whose effectiveness
has been intensely debated.
"An influential Russian legislator said here tonight that
Russian officials have been urging Mr. Putin to take a "more
measured tone" in speaking publicly about Mr. Bush's plans on
missile defense.
""Frankly, I do not think it is in our interest to stir up an
excessive dust storm on this subject," said Vladimir P. Lukin, a
deputy speaker of the Russian Parliament and former ambassador to
Washington. Whatever Washington does, Russia's nuclear deterrent
will remain unaffected by American missile defenses for at least 10
to 15 years, he said, "so we have no need to be hysterical."
""It is the American authorities who are interested in
destroying this treaty," Mr. Lukin continued, "They must deal with
the problems this creates with their opposition in Congress, with
their allies, with China as it increases its nuclear buildup; it is
your problem how to avoid stimulating an arms race with India and
Pakistan."
"And, he added, "if they have the money to build the most
excessive response to the least probable threat situation, that's
O.K."
"Since his first meeting with Mr. Bush, Mr. Putin has met with
each of Mr. Bush's principal advisers: Secretary of State Colin L.
Powell, who accompanied Mr. Bush to Slovenia in June; Condoleezza
Rice, Mr. Bush's national security aide who traveled to Moscow in
July; and Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld, who visited here
in August.
"Russian officials complained during the summer that they were
confused by the variety of statements from Washington on whether the
Bush administration plans to negotiate a new strategic accord to
replace the ABM treaty and to cut nuclear stockpiles further, or
whether it is preparing to act alone.
(more)
(2
following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Missile Defense
|