New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Russian military leaders have expressed concern about US plans
for a national missile defense system. Will defense technology be
limited by possibilities for a strategic imbalance? Is this just SDI
all over again?
(7942 previous messages)
rshowalter
- 11:08pm Aug 20, 2001 EST (#7943
of 7944) Robert Showalter
showalte@macc.wisc.edu
These references seem appropriate here:
MD7729 lunarchick
8/2/01 11:52pm
notions of TREASON http://www.newcriterion.com/archive/11/dec92/treason.htm
http://www.haverford.edu/relg/sells/complicity.html
http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa-271.html
http://www.tehelka.com/currentaffairs/feb%202001/ca021001drdo1.htm
http://www.arts.mcgill.ca/programs/misc/clarke.htm
http://www.law.indiana.edu/ilj/v72/no4/rehnquis.html
http://www.people.virginia.edu/~dpm5h/bebiano.html
http://www.omnigroup.com/~cirocco/academic/malory.html
The Constitution of the United States says, in Article. 3.
Section. 3. Clause 1, that
" Treason against the United States, shall
consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their
Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort" see http://lists.his.com/intelforum/msg04791.html
http://ps.superb.net/iconoclast/html3.html
http://www.rockfordinstitute.org/News/Trifkovic/NewsST022301.htm
http://www.14words.com/wvitems.html
http://www.nationalsecurity.org/teamb/conclusion.html
MD7730 lunarchick
8/2/01 11:59pm
Looks straighforward re refs:
Misrepresentation, Fraud http://www.google.com/search?q=misrepresentation+fraud&btnG=Google+Search&hl=en&safe=off
Bad Faith http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=Bad+faith&btnG=Google+Search
Duty-definition of http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=Bad+faith&btnG=Google+Search
Bad Faith Military http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=Bad+Faith+military&btnG=Google+Search
MD7732 lunarchick
8/3/01 6:34am
Dereliction of duty: http://ecco.bsee.swin.edu.au/text/roget/entries/927.html
http://www.military-net.com/books/html/sgp76.html
http://www.mlui.org/projects/propertyrights/publictrustalliance/dodreport.html
http://images.amazon.com/images/P/0060187956.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
http://conwebwatch.tripod.com/stories/2000/awol.html
http://www.peer.org/publications/wp_duty.html
http://www.mecprotects.org/deq.htm
HK: http://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/200103/28/0328226.htm
http://www.inq7.net/brk/2001/feb/26/afp4.htm
MD7733 lunarchick
8/3/01 6:52am
rshowalter
- 11:09pm Aug 20, 2001 EST (#7944
of 7944) Robert Showalter
showalte@macc.wisc.edu
It should be a duty to work out basic facts about
what missile defense proposals can do -- especially when this can so
clearly be done on the basis of the open literature -- and where the
projects proposed are so clearly unworkable.
New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Missile Defense
Enter your response, then click the POST MY MESSAGE
button below. See the quick-edit
help for more information.
|