Forums

toolbar



 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Russian military leaders have expressed concern about US plans for a national missile defense system. Will defense technology be limited by possibilities for a strategic imbalance? Is this just SDI all over again?


Earliest MessagesPrevious MessagesRecent MessagesOutline (7942 previous messages)

rshowalter - 11:08pm Aug 20, 2001 EST (#7943 of 7944) Delete Message
Robert Showalter showalte@macc.wisc.edu

These references seem appropriate here:

MD7729 lunarchick 8/2/01 11:52pm

notions of TREASON
http://www.newcriterion.com/archive/11/dec92/treason.htm
http://www.haverford.edu/relg/sells/complicity.html http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa-271.html
http://www.tehelka.com/currentaffairs/feb%202001/ca021001drdo1.htm
http://www.arts.mcgill.ca/programs/misc/clarke.htm http://www.law.indiana.edu/ilj/v72/no4/rehnquis.html
http://www.people.virginia.edu/~dpm5h/bebiano.html http://www.omnigroup.com/~cirocco/academic/malory.html

The Constitution of the United States says, in Article. 3. Section. 3. Clause 1, that

" Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort" see
http://lists.his.com/intelforum/msg04791.html http://ps.superb.net/iconoclast/html3.html
http://www.rockfordinstitute.org/News/Trifkovic/NewsST022301.htm
http://www.14words.com/wvitems.html http://www.nationalsecurity.org/teamb/conclusion.html

MD7730 lunarchick 8/2/01 11:59pm

Looks straighforward re refs:

Misrepresentation, Fraud http://www.google.com/search?q=misrepresentation+fraud&btnG=Google+Search&hl=en&safe=off

Bad Faith http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=Bad+faith&btnG=Google+Search

Duty-definition of http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=Bad+faith&btnG=Google+Search

Bad Faith Military http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=Bad+Faith+military&btnG=Google+Search

MD7732 lunarchick 8/3/01 6:34am

Dereliction of duty: http://ecco.bsee.swin.edu.au/text/roget/entries/927.html http://www.military-net.com/books/html/sgp76.html
http://www.mlui.org/projects/propertyrights/publictrustalliance/dodreport.html
http://images.amazon.com/images/P/0060187956.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
http://conwebwatch.tripod.com/stories/2000/awol.html http://www.peer.org/publications/wp_duty.html
http://www.mecprotects.org/deq.htm HK: http://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/200103/28/0328226.htm
http://www.inq7.net/brk/2001/feb/26/afp4.htm

MD7733 lunarchick 8/3/01 6:52am

rshowalter - 11:09pm Aug 20, 2001 EST (#7944 of 7944) Delete Message
Robert Showalter showalte@macc.wisc.edu

It should be a duty to work out basic facts about what missile defense proposals can do -- especially when this can so clearly be done on the basis of the open literature -- and where the projects proposed are so clearly unworkable.

 Read Subscriptions  Cancel Subscriptions  Post Message
 Email to Sysop  Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense


Enter your response, then click the POST MY MESSAGE button below.
See the
quick-edit help for more information.








Home | Site Index | Site Search | Forums | Archives | Shopping

News | Business | International | National | New York Region | NYT Front Page | Obituaries | Politics | Quick News | Sports | Science | Technology/Internet | Weather
Editorial | Op-Ed

Features | Arts | Automobiles | Books | Cartoons | Crossword | Games | Job Market | Living | Magazine | Real Estate | Travel | Week in Review

Help/Feedback | Classifieds | Services | New York Today

Copyright 2001 The New York Times Company