New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Russian military leaders have expressed concern about US plans
for a national missile defense system. Will defense technology be
limited by possibilities for a strategic imbalance? Is this just SDI
all over again?
(7302 previous messages)
rshowalter
- 10:23pm Jul 22, 2001 EST (#7303
of 7335) Robert Showalter
showalte@macc.wisc.edu
Some of NYT's Missile Defense Coverage this week
Missile Interception Test Was Hit-and-Miss, Pentagon
Reports By JAMES DAO http://www.nytimes.com/2001/07/19/national/19RADA.html
Putin Says Russia Won't Join China in Countering U.S.
Shield by MICHAEL WINES http://www.nytimes.com/2001/07/18/international/europe/18CND-RUSS.html
A Missile Shield Road Map http://www.nytimes.com/2001/07/17/opinion/17TUE2.html
Amid Applause, Caution Urged on Missile Defense by JAMES
DAO http://www.nytimes.com/2001/07/16/politics/16MISS.html
The New Pentagon War Strategy http://www.nytimes.com/2001/07/16/opinion/16MON2.html
Russia, China Sign Treaty Amid Concerns About U.S. By
PATRICK E. TYLER http://www.nytimes.com/2001/07/16/international/16CND-RUSS.html
Pentagon Officials Report Hit in Missile Defense Test By
JAMES DAO http://www.nytimes.com/2001/07/15/national/15MISS.html
Nuclear Arms Still Keep the Peace By ROBERT S. McNAMARA
and THOMAS GRAHAM Jr. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/07/15/opinion/15MCNA.html
. . . . Deterrence, and the agreements that frame it, must continue
to be a factor in American-Russian relations for the foreseeable
future
rshowalter
- 10:43pm Jul 22, 2001 EST (#7304
of 7335) Robert Showalter
showalte@macc.wisc.edu
MD6210 rshowalter
6/27/01 8:37pm
Almarst's key objection to nuclear disarmament,
and to NMD, was stated in MD892 almarstel2001
3/9/01 12:48pm
Almarst has repeated this point many times, and
been consistent and totally clear -- at the same time that his
real desire for peace, and nuclear disarmament has also been
clear.
Here's a question:
" Is it really impossible for Russia, in
combination with, and in communication with China, the nations of
the EU, and other nations, to assure itself that the US will act
responsibly?
it seems to me that the answer has to be
" no - this cannot be impossible."
Perhaps, in part because of this underlying circumstance,
accomodations may happen gracefully.
MD6211rshowalter
6/27/01 8:43pm ... MD6212 rshowalter
6/27/01 8:58pm
Wouldn't that be beautiful? And wouldn't that be efficient?
Here's hoping.
lunarchick
- 11:05pm Jul 22, 2001 EST (#7305
of 7335) lunarchick@www.com
Russia
Have successfully put a spy satellite into orbit - via R7 family of
rockets. But - had a 3rd stage seperation failure re a launch of
a rocket from an N-Sub.
MD cuts in Arsnel Bwsh in conjunction with Russia - Putin makes
announcement. Discussions with Rice Tuesday. Bwsh looking to new
strategic architecture for C21, & praises Putin for someone
willing to think in new ways. (Putin surprised MD cuts & Sheild
are on same agenda)
lunarchick
- 11:10pm Jul 22, 2001 EST (#7306
of 7335) lunarchick@www.com
ASEAN (Malaysia recalcigent re own car industry, leading to
bi-lateral agreements) Suggestion that CHINA join ASEAN - and have
own sphere of influence.
lunarchick
- 11:23pm Jul 22, 2001 EST (#7307
of 7335) lunarchick@www.com
Biological
Weapons - fine (?) says USA
lunarchick
- 11:29pm Jul 22, 2001 EST (#7308
of 7335) lunarchick@www.com
Showalter .. 'What do you reckon Putin will be looking for,
that's --- out
of Tuesday's talks with Condi-Rice?' and visa versa
(27
following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Missile Defense
|