New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Russian military leaders have expressed concern about US plans
for a national missile defense system. Will defense technology be
limited by possibilities for a strategic imbalance? Is this just SDI
all over again?
(7293 previous messages)
rshowalter
- 07:49pm Jul 22, 2001 EST (#7294
of 7334) Robert Showalter
showalte@macc.wisc.edu
AMERICAN WAY: A World Seeking Security Is Told There's Just
One Shield By MICHAEL WINES http://www.nytimes.com/2001/07/22/weekinreview/22WINE.html
starts:
" Moscow GEOPOLITICS needn't be mind- bending.
Think of a centuries-long floating poker game in which the lead
keeps changing hands, from Greece to Rome, Spain to Britain,
France to Prussia. These days, one player not only holds the chips
and a stack of i.o.u.'s; he has most of his rivals' clothes,
too.
The idea of "geopolitics" as a "game" is an old one
-- one taught very carefully and explicitly by in the German
academic school of "geopolitics" which Hitler used to support his
sense that, for "world historical figures, or nations" -- there
was no morality. In Herman Wouk's War and Remembrance
series, there is a fictional German General Von Roon, imprisoned for
war crimes, who writes realistically in this traditions. The
tradition was followed, with a change in language, by academics such
as Hans Morgnthau, and diplomat-academics like Henry Kissinger who
were deeply influenced (sometimes by means of personal contact) by
this German tradition.
Here is Condaleezza Rice:
"I read early on and was influenced by [Hans]
Morgenthau” http://www.thenewrepublic.com/magazines/tnr/current/heilbrunn092799.html
The problems with viewing "geopolitics" as a "game" "above
and beyond morality" is that it leads to gruesome consequences.
From this perspective, human costs aren't accounted -- from this
perspective, human pain doesn't exist. Nazis often slept easily,
indoctrinated, and in their view excused, by a "geopolitical view."
Americans, who year after year have been explicitly denying the
relevance of morality to politics, have found a geopolitical view
essential as a way of justifying their nuclear agressiveness, as
well.
The "geopolitical" view -- the view of international politics as
a "game" - - leads logically to actions, like some of
Kissinger's, that can, in Freidman's words "make Machiavelli seem
like one of the Angels of Mercy."
MD5470-74 rshowalter
6/19/01 4:46pm
MD5784-5787 rshowalter
6/22/01 1:05pm
MD7048 rshowalter
7/15/01 10:51am
rshowalter
- 07:50pm Jul 22, 2001 EST (#7295
of 7334) Robert Showalter
showalte@macc.wisc.edu
Now, for reasons of decency, but also because world power is
becoming both more widely distributed and more diffused, we have
to do better than that.
We can.
Today there was progress -- though there would have been more
progress on small arms if moral sensitity had been greater.
In the new world, where more things are to be seen, and
learned about in detail -- higher standards of morality are becoming
more practical than before. It is becoming more
important to take into account the idea that unjust killing is
unfortunate - even if it happens to be the killing of noncitizens of
the nation state considering costs.
We are living in a world where the incentives toward peace are
getting greater, and the penalities for military agressiveness are
getting greater - and we may, acting reasonably, be able to preserve
the world, and make it a more comfortable and prosperous place.
rshowalter
- 07:55pm Jul 22, 2001 EST (#7296
of 7334) Robert Showalter
showalte@macc.wisc.edu
Russia's military and security needs, and America's military and
security needs, ought to be entirely compatable here - - especially
when both sides reasonably estimate what "missile defense"
and "space based weapons" can reasonably be expected to do,
in the forseeable future.
They can be expected to do very little.
If the americans have to take some time to make sure of that,
within reasonable negotiated safeguards, the Russians may,
considering the situation as a whole, have no reason to object.
(38
following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Missile Defense
|