New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Russian military leaders have expressed concern about US plans
for a national missile defense system. Will defense technology be
limited by possibilities for a strategic imbalance? Is this just SDI
all over again?
(6668 previous messages)
rshowalter
- 11:42am Jul 6, 2001 EST (#6669
of 6676) Robert Showalter
showalte@macc.wisc.edu
The responses by gisterme since MD6431 rshowalter
7/2/01 7:21pm have provided very strong and revealing detail
making it harder and harder to doubt that the NMD program being set
out by the administration is fraudulent.
That can be shown in more and more detail, the more work one
chooses to do, and to attend to.
I believe that both gisterme's content since, and his
style, support the view that he doesn't know how to build a working
missile defense system, and doesn't have any valid reason to believe
that one can be built. But he does believe that "big lie" tactics
can be relied on. Too often, he's been right.
Red Tide Rising by PAUL KRUGMAN http://www.nytimes.com/2001/07/06/opinion/06KRUG.html
" During the debate over George W. Bush's tax
cut, administration officials told wavering supporters not to
worry. The Congressional Budget Office, they insisted, was
underestimating future surpluses; in fact there would be plenty of
money, even after the tax cut, for other priorities.
" Whoops.
rshowalter
- 11:44am Jul 6, 2001 EST (#6670
of 6676) Robert Showalter
showalte@macc.wisc.edu
MD5976 rshowalter
6/24/01 8:50pm :
Bertotdt Brecht's essay, WRITING THE TRUTH, FIVE
DIFFICULTIES is in my version of his play, GALILEO , set
into English by Charles Laughton.
It includes this:
" It takes courage to say that the good were
defeated not because they were good, but because they were
weak."
When the truth is too weak, we have to ask why? Was it indeed the
truth? Or were there systematic barriers to the propagation of the
truth -- chain breakers?
Fear is a problem, and a deeply embedded one, all through the
system, for journalists, for members of the government, and for
people who depend on the government (that is, all of us.) MD5977
rshowalter
6/24/01 8:52pm . . . MD5978 rshowalter
6/24/01 9:00pm
I think some may enjoy Chain Breakers: http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee79f4e/618
and might perhaps enjoy it more in terms of the information linked
to MD6613 rshowalter
7/4/01 11:46pm
rshowalter
- 11:47am Jul 6, 2001 EST (#6671
of 6676) Robert Showalter
showalte@macc.wisc.edu
Exposition matters. Attention to detail matters.
There's a phrase that I read once. Three words.
" Hitler went unchecked.
Hitler subverted an entire society based on nonsense and lies,
many ornately detailed, and destroyed much of the world in doing so.
He hoped, in the senses that matter to most of us, to destroy the
whole world. In the ways that mattered, he wasn't effectively
checked at the level of ideas.
markk46b
"Science in the News" 8/23/00 2:44am ... rshowalt
"Science in the News" 8/23/00 7:31am
The connections of the Bush family, and the right wing of the
Republican Party, to NAZI roots ought to be remembered from time to
time (search "NAZI", "big lie" this thread) when the behavior of the
Bush administration is being considered.
Republicans, most of all, should be concerned about this, and
wish to fix it.
rshowalter
- 11:51am Jul 6, 2001 EST (#6672
of 6676) Robert Showalter
showalte@macc.wisc.edu
The web is not very actively checked for accuracy, so some may
question whether this site represents credible data and reasonable
interpretation.
I believe that it may, and that people who know how selection
processes in organizations occur in the United States may find the
information here, in its interconnections, worth considering when
the issue of unconditional trust of the Bush administration arises.
George W Bush went Awol and he is still getting away with
it. http://awol.gq.nu/
Staffs can check things of this nature, in a way individuals
cannot, when they choose to do so.
With the questions that have been raised about the sanity and
honesty of the present US missile defense initiative, I feel that
the issue may merit attention. I found it interesting, and possibly
helpful, if a view of circumstances that account for all the
credible data on human survival is to be crafted.
rshowalter
- 12:05pm Jul 6, 2001 EST (#6673
of 6676) Robert Showalter
showalte@macc.wisc.edu
The level of feel for propriety exemplified in http://www.nytimes.com/2001/03/05/politics/05CARL.html
-- would indicate a "culture" where thoughts of accountability, for
either facts or money, would be almost futile, wouldn't you think?
I wonder how many enlisted men (and there are plenty of literate
ones) could read "Elder Bush in Big GOP Cast Toiling for Top
Equity Firm" by LESLIE WAYNE without being ashamed?
MD6583 rshowalter
7/4/01 9:20pm suggests searches.
(3
following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Missile Defense
|