New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Russian military leaders have expressed concern about US plans
for a national missile defense system. Will defense technology be
limited by possibilities for a strategic imbalance? Is this just SDI
all over again?
(6463 previous messages)
lunarchick
- 08:37am Jul 3, 2001 EST (#6464
of 6473) lunarchick@www.com
A group of 100 protesters on Tuesday invaded a British defense
site which could play a key role in the United States ``Son of
Star Wars'' missile defense system.
British, Danish and American protesters were among a group of
activists occupying three areas in the Menwith Hill base in
northern England, campaign group Greenpeace said.
lunarchick
- 08:41am Jul 3, 2001 EST (#6465
of 6473) lunarchick@www.com
Vladimir trumped George, convincingly. First he played the
reciprocal-treaty card, then followed with the China card. He won
the hand. Were it a card game, that outcome would be merely
interesting. But Russian President Vladimir Putin and U.S.
President George Bush are playing with nuclear missiles, and that
makes
it dangerous.
lunarchick
- 08:48am Jul 3, 2001 EST (#6466
of 6473) lunarchick@www.com
Photo-GreenPeace
smartalix
- 09:06am Jul 3, 2001 EST (#6467
of 6473) Anyone who denies you information considers
themselves your master
gisterme?
lunarchick
- 09:20am Jul 3, 2001 EST (#6468
of 6473) lunarchick@www.com
smartie ... not walking in a dream ... it's the dreamtime
this-a-way ... Nite! :)
almarst-2001
- 09:29am Jul 3, 2001 EST (#6469
of 6473)
Iran on Tuesday commemorated the 13th anniversary of the
shooting down of an Iranian airliner over the Gulf by a US cruiser,
killing all 290 people aboard. - http://asia.dailynews.yahoo.com/headlines/world/article.html?s=asia/headlines/010703/world/afp/Iran_marks_13th_anniversary_of_US_downing_of_Iran_airliner.html
almarst-2001
- 09:38am Jul 3, 2001 EST (#6470
of 6473)
George Orwell In 2001: Speaking From the Grave - http://www.fair.org/media-beat/010628.html
"I dreamed I saw George Orwell last night. Alive as you or
me.
He'd been watching the news, and he was quite irate. "All this
doublespeak about war crimes is appalling," he said. "That chap
Milosevic -- I see the U.S. government wants him tried for war
crimes."
"Yes," I replied. "All the pundits agree."
"But meanwhile, the news coverage of the Israeli prime minister's
visit to the White House failed to suggest that he, also, would be
suitable for prosecution as a war criminal. After all, evidence
clearly implicates Ariel Sharon in the massacres of hundreds of
Palestinian people inside the Sabra and Shatila refugee camps in
Lebanon in 1982. Why aren't the media commentators demanding that he
stand in the dock at The Hague?"
"Well, the U.S. government is closely allied with Israel, so --"
Orwell cut me off. "I was asking a rhetorical question. I get it.
Believe me." His voice began to waver and fade, so only fragments
were audible. "Plenty of examples ... Turkish government ... U.S.
ally ... killing Kurds for many years ... brutally suppressing their
language and culture ... where's the press?" He coughed, then
started again, faintly: "Henry Kissinger ... wholesale murder in
Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia ... East Timor ... and remember Chile ...
Any evenhanded reporting would ..."
"During the last few months," I interjected, "the journalist
Christopher Hitchens has raised quite a ruckus about Kissinger and
--"
Orwell waved a hand, dismissively. "Scant comfort ... news
delayed is news denied ... sickening media manipulation ..."
"You sound way too radical for mainstream media," I exclaimed.
"Yet these days you're almost universally revered."
Orwell laughed grimly, in the midst of coughing. His next words
were at full volume. "Indeed. Embraced with one hand and watered
down with the other. Now rendered as dreadfully weak tea and --"
Then, suddenly, I woke up. The dull thud of a newspaper echoed on
the front porch. "Mr. Orwell," I murmured, "what were you saying?"
But there was no reply. Just the filtered light of dawn and the
far-off sound of "Morning Edition" on National Public Radio.
George Orwell died in 1950. If he had lived long enough to reach
the 21st century, it's a good bet that -- while treasuring the civil
liberties and other freedoms that exist in the United States -- he
would deplore the deep patterns of indoctrination that undergo
constant reinforcement in our society.
"Democratic" processes of intellectual conformity and insidious
political propaganda were of great concern to Orwell. Not content to
merely point a finger from West to East in his satirical novel about
Soviet tyranny, "Animal Farm," he wrote a challenging preface, which
disappeared for nearly 30 years.
The preface included a downbeat analysis of the conditions of
public discourse in England, where "admiration for Russia happens to
be fashionable at this moment." Orwell astutely speculated that
"quite possibly that particular fashion will not last." But, he went
on: "To exchange one orthodoxy for another is not necessarily an
advance. The enemy is the gramophone mind, whether or not one agrees
with the record that is being played at the moment."
Today, Orwell's record-player metaphor is a bit outdated -- we
could refer to "the CD mind" -- but his statement remains acutely
relevant. Ideologies are most pernicious when they're so dominant
that they aren't even recognized as such.
What Orwell wrote in his introduction, describing the England of
1945, is no less applicable to the United States of 2001: "In this
country, intellectual cowardice is the worst enemy a writer or
journalist has to face... Unpopular ideas can be silenced, and
inconvenient facts kept dark, without the need for any official ban.
... At any given moment there is an orthodoxy, a body of ideas which
it is
almarst-2001
- 09:45am Jul 3, 2001 EST (#6471
of 6473)
U.S. Preparing to Resume Nuclear Tests? - http://www.accuracy.org/press_releases/PR062901.htm
(2
following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Missile Defense
|