Forums

toolbar



 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Russian military leaders have expressed concern about US plans for a national missile defense system. Will defense technology be limited by possibilities for a strategic imbalance? Is this just SDI all over again?


Earliest MessagesPrevious MessagesRecent MessagesOutline (6248 previous messages)

lunarchick - 07:43pm Jun 28, 2001 EST (#6249 of 6254)
lunarchick@www.com

!

rshowalter - 07:44pm Jun 28, 2001 EST (#6250 of 6254) Delete Message
Robert Showalter showalte@macc.wisc.edu

Dawn, it was September 25 - links #266-269.

gisterme - 07:50pm Jun 28, 2001 EST (#6251 of 6254)

Here are links to current unilateral US arms reduction proposals...

All MX missiles:

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/06/28/politics/28MISS.html?searchpv=nytToday

1/3 of B1-B bomber nuclear force:

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/06/27/national/27BOMB.html

WRT the B1-B cutback it looks like the numbers I mentioned earler (from CNN) weren't right (CNN seems to get a lot of stuff wrong). The ratio of 1 in 3 ratio was. CNN said 93 of 300 aircraft would be cut rather than 30 of 93.

lunarchick - 07:54pm Jun 28, 2001 EST (#6252 of 6254)
lunarchick@www.com

"The ratio of 1 in 3 ratio was. CNN said 93 of 300 aircraft would be cut rather than 30 of 93. "

207 lost in one CNN stocktake!

lunarchick - 07:59pm Jun 28, 2001 EST (#6253 of 6254)
lunarchick@www.com

Biog: Hans Mark

rshowalter - 08:00pm Jun 28, 2001 EST (#6254 of 6254) Delete Message
Robert Showalter showalte@macc.wisc.edu

I'm glad to see the proposals.

I'm trying to think through, in ways that are both true and decently tactful,

how I think almarst is muddled in spots;

trying to do the same about gisterme ; and

trying to do the same about myself.

Trying ain't succeeding -- but I'm working on it.

I'm pretty sure of this. On the most basic desires, for peace and continuation of the world -- we're agreed -- however much we may disagree about a lot of significant things involved.

Pretty sure of something else. Everybody's angry in some appropriate spots, for some appropriate reasons -- but not all the spots and not all the reasons, make perfect sense.

I'm gonna try to cycle through these questions a while -- mostly, I guess, so I can get more focus (maybe focus on a wrong answer, but a focus) on my own muddle. And so I can ask some questions.

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Email to Sysop  Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense


Enter your response, then click the POST MY MESSAGE button below.
See the
quick-edit help for more information.








Home | Site Index | Site Search | Forums | Archives | Shopping

News | Business | International | National | New York Region | NYT Front Page | Obituaries | Politics | Quick News | Sports | Science | Technology/Internet | Weather
Editorial | Op-Ed

Features | Arts | Automobiles | Books | Cartoons | Crossword | Games | Job Market | Living | Magazine | Real Estate | Travel | Week in Review

Help/Feedback | Classifieds | Services | New York Today

Copyright 2001 The New York Times Company