New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Russian military leaders have expressed concern about US plans
for a national missile defense system. Will defense technology be
limited by possibilities for a strategic imbalance? Is this just SDI
all over again?
(6099 previous messages)
gisterme
- 08:07pm Jun 26, 2001 EST (#6100
of 6121)
almarst,
I'm sticking to my expectation that the US will not unilaterally
build a BMD eventhough it could. I also don't believe that the US
will unilaterally abrogate or even legally withdraw from the 1972
ABM treaty. Remember that those were the big IFs that president
Putin used to qualify his threat to increase the Russian MIRV
arsenal.
Almarst, I'll bet you a buck that BMD will become a joint program
including at least Russia, Japan and some European allies and that
the 1972 treaty will be revised or replaced by negotiation long
before it is ever violated by anyone. I'll also say that US and
Russian ICBM fleets will be DRASTICALLY reduced (by at least 90%) as
a result of the cooperation. Let's give the process 10 years. Care
to take that bet? :-) Probably not. Why would you take a bet that
you should HOPE I win.
rshowalter
- 08:12pm Jun 26, 2001 EST (#6101
of 6121) Robert Showalter
showalte@macc.wisc.edu
gisterme , those are two good posts.
gisterme
6/26/01 7:33pm includes this and much more.
" WRT maintaining "calibration" on sensitive
equipment, welcome to the digital age, Robert. Updating
calibration is not the same kind of problem it was back in the
"analog servo" days.
that's VERY true in very many ways. But there are some
qualifications, as well.
I'll respond to the very good questions you raise here early in
the morning -- and try to do justice to the questions. And treat
both the problems and opportunities, if I can.
I'll also respond to gisterme
6/26/01 7:50pm also, which makes a reasonable point, that has to
be thought about, I believe, in almarst's interdependent
context.
I'm out for today.
Thanks.
possumdag
- 08:16pm Jun 26, 2001 EST (#6102
of 6121) Possumdag@excite.com
GI said: 'it's up to the government to decide what "acutally
matters'
government: persons authorized to administer the laws
authorize: verb means to give someone the authority to act /
representative who was accredited by his government
accredit: To believe; to credit; to put trust in.
Trust: Firm reliance on the integrity, ability, or character
of a person or thing
in·teg·ri·ty (n-tgr-t) n. Steadfast adherence to a strict
moral or ethical code. The state of being unimpaired; soundness.
The quality or condition of being whole or undivided;
completeness.
mor·al (môrl, mr-) adj. Of or concerned with the judgment of
the goodness or badness of human action and character: moral
scrutiny; a moral quandary. Teaching or exhibiting goodness or
correctness of character and behavior: a moral lesson. Conforming
to standards of what is right or just in behavior; virtuous: a
moral life. Arising from conscience or the sense of right and
wrong: a moral obligation. Having psychological rather than
physical or tangible effects: a moral victory; moral support.
Based on strong likelihood or firm conviction, rather than on the
actual evidence: a moral certainty.
eth·ic (thk) n. A set of principles of right conduct. A theory
or a system of moral values: “An ethic of service is at war with a
craving for gain” (Gregg Easterbrook).
conflict of interest n : a situation in which a public
official's decisions are influenced by the official's personal
interests
patriotic adj : inspired by love for your country
loy·al (loil) adj. Steadfast in allegiance to one's homeland,
government, or sovereign. Faithful to a person, ideal, custom,
cause, or duty.
stead·fast also sted·fast (stdfst, -fst) adj. Fixed or
unchanging; steady. Firmly loyal or constant; unswerving
brain·wash·ing (brnwshng, -wôshng) n. Intensive, forcible
indoctrination, usually political or religious, aimed at
destroying a person's basic convictions and attitudes and
replacing them with an alternative set of fixed beliefs. The
application of a concentrated means of persuasion, such as an
advertising campaign or repeated suggestion, in order to develop a
specific belief or motivation.
night soil n. Human excrement collected .. by Night cart,
a cart used to remove the contents of privies by night.
Visonary : a person with unusual powers of foresight
change : To undergo transformation or transition GI said:
'it's up to the government to decide what "acutally matters'
possumdag
- 08:36pm Jun 26, 2001 EST (#6103
of 6121) Possumdag@excite.com
GI: Putin link actually started here from London: MD5751
lunarchick 6/22/01 9:20am Showalter's a patriot glued to the
NYTs
Saw a documentary on Putin .. pronounced with ff's he was
influenced in life by a film called 'The sword and the sheild' (how
appropriate), he listened (80:20) gained from experiences as relayed
to him .. 'Nobody was more surprised than HE when he was picked
to succeed Yeltsin' Putin had tried to sort out the rabble to
the south to restore semblances of peace to that geographic region
.. with the approval of the Russian People. Putin got berated
by a widow (remember sunken submarine) who critisied his emphasis on
the State making provision for her - rather than empathising with
her emotional loss.
Geeze thinks I. Why doesn't Russia revise the monachy .. first
families, with caring womenfolk in fancy hats, are a great focus for
the people in times of empathetic
need ... expensive on upkeep - yet indispensible in times of
National Emergency!
possumdag
- 08:43pm Jun 26, 2001 EST (#6104
of 6121) Possumdag@excite.com
GI: it's up the government to decide what actually matters ...
raises the question of who's elected (and how), and who has power
and is not elected, nor brought to book. As in who has access to
squillion$ without auditing and accountability, uses it to set their
own agendas, and sits outside periferal vision.
Noted in an article above that Putin thought it was time they
& the USA took a good look at the functionality of the Fifth
Estate and brought it into line - presumably to work in the
interests of the nation, rather than the NAZI types who set the
rules, hold power, and 'use the young patriots' in ways and through
means that sit way outside 'The Golden Rule'.
(17
following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Missile Defense
|