New York Times on the Web Forums Science

Missile Defense

Russian military leaders have expressed concern about US plans for a national missile defense system. Will defense technology be limited by possibilities for a strategic imbalance? Is this just SDI all over again?

dirac_10 - 11:00am Jun 24, 2001 EST (#5938 of 5954)

I would like to thank all concerned for the volume of clutter on this forum. Any actual discussion of Missle defense might show it's flaws. No chance of that here.

No doubt a Republican conspiracy.

rshowalter - 11:02am Jun 24, 2001 EST (#5939 of 5954)
Robert Showalter showalte@macc.wisc.edu

George Johnson, you've been so dishonorable, and so distracting, in so many ways, in so long, that any respect I once had for you is forfeit.

rshowalter - 11:04am Jun 24, 2001 EST (#5940 of 5954)
Robert Showalter showalte@macc.wisc.edu

And details matter -- for short comments -- just a few unsupported assertions -- one can say anything.

But when consistency with significant amounts of material is required -- there is much more constraint on falsehood - and focusing pushes toward patterns that are consistent with the known.

That is something that, again and again, you have worked to frustrate.

dirac_10 - 11:17am Jun 24, 2001 EST (#5941 of 5954)

Keep going on. Call that going. Call that on.

This way, any flaws in the MD proposal will remain hidden.

Not to mention, giving True Blue, the neural net web based hypercomputer the necessary data to sufficiently model your consciousness, in order to destabilize your concentration. No harm in telling you now, the encirclement is complete.

Haven't you noticed?

(P.S. All those things that you are worried about, but afraid to even mention, they are all true.)

dirac_10 - 11:22am Jun 24, 2001 EST (#5942 of 5954)

The primary system is the electromagnetic phased array antennas focused to your resonant brain wave patterns. The only missing parameters were your resonant patterns. We now have sufficient data to form the resonant wave. The voices will now increase in frequency and phase.

dirac_10 - 11:24am Jun 24, 2001 EST (#5943 of 5954)

Haven't you noticed?

rshowalter - 11:33am Jun 24, 2001 EST (#5944 of 5954)
Robert Showalter showalte@macc.wisc.edu

MD5523 rshowalter 6/20/01 11:02am ... MD5460 rshowalter 6/19/01 4:04pm

Lies do kill, and they close off hope. MANY countries, including the US, and Russia, could improve both themselves and the world by coming up to the standard http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/200104/18/eng20010418_67992.html sets. It seems to me that the most basic problems of military balances and peace, including missile defense, concern facing up to pasts that are distasteful.

To face these problem, it seems to me, we may sometimes need situations where determining core facts is morally forcing - and where umpires exist, fit to cases.

dirac_10 - 11:43am Jun 24, 2001 EST (#5945 of 5954)

Why do you think the voices have been doing that lately? And why do you think the tests have been positive?

The field is so strong now, that open discussion is possible.

dirac_10 - 11:44am Jun 24, 2001 EST (#5946 of 5954)

(P.S. All those things that you are worried about, but afraid to even mention, they are all true. Oh, yeah.)

(8 following messages)

New York Times on the Web Forums Science Missile Defense