New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Russian military leaders have expressed concern about US plans
for a national missile defense system. Will defense technology be
limited by possibilities for a strategic imbalance? Is this just SDI
all over again?
(5818 previous messages)
lunarchick
- 05:55pm Jun 22, 2001 EST (#5819
of 5846) lunarchick@www.com
In January, he obtained a copy of the memo in the course of his
own research, but out of respect for Komisar chose not to write
about it until she published her story in the U.S. After Kornbluh
got a copy of the Kissinger book, he fired off a quick piece,
comparing the official account of the Pinochet rendezvous with the
sanitized account Kissinger offers in his book.
In his Nation piece of March 29, now out, Kornbluh writes that
Kissinger’s account of the rendezvous was less than candid. In a new
and unpublished piece, Komisar accuses Kissinger of presenting a
"selective and distorted" version of the meeting; for example, she
says, Kissinger describes Pinochet as exhibiting "no special
warmth," while the memo describes the general as "grateful" to his
U.S. visitors.
So now the story has made its way up the food chain to The
Nation. But that’s still a far cry from the mainstream. As Kornbluh
points out, just because editors might not have wanted to buy
Komisar’s account, they don’t have an excuse for ignoring the story.
"Any news editor worth his salt should have read that piece in the
London Observer and tried to get the document and done a story on
it," he says.
Meanwhile, the mainstream media have been laying wreaths at
Kissinger’s feet. Years of Renewal was excerpted in the March 15
issue of Time, which declared the book "worth the wait." In her 60
Minutes interview with Kissinger that aired March 7, Lesley Stahl
threw only softballs. But then again, in this age of access
journalism, who wants to be a bomb-thrower? It doesn’t make you any
friends. Back in 1976, when the Voice published the "Pike Papers,"
which were leaked documents from a congressional investigation of
the CIA, Kissinger himself accused the Voice of distortion and of
fomenting a "new" McCarthyism.
This time around, Kissinger did not return calls for comment.
lunarchick
- 05:57pm Jun 22, 2001 EST (#5820
of 5846) lunarchick@www.com
Seems the American readership are being short-changed by their
own media!
lunarchick
- 05:59pm Jun 22, 2001 EST (#5821
of 5846) lunarchick@www.com
Begs the question :
Why - in the land of the FREE - are American Newspapers inhibited
?
Suggests there would be reprisals regarding their people,
income, influence, or circulation.
rshowalter
- 06:00pm Jun 22, 2001 EST (#5822
of 5846) Robert Showalter
showalte@macc.wisc.edu
The American media is very afraid -- and for some good reasons.
You can't blame the people too much - but you CAN blame the
system, and change it.
The patterns of "the culture of lying" were set up before World
War I, and have been perfected, but have been solidified, since.
With internet usages, and the much lower cost of memory -- we
can throw those usages away, and see that things are
checked.
lunarchick
- 06:01pm Jun 22, 2001 EST (#5823
of 5846) lunarchick@www.com
Where would these reprisal threats eminate from?
Obviously a rich power source.
Obviously not the formal channels of government.
Obviously there have to be sinister factors denying 'freedom of
the press' in the USA!
rshowalter
- 06:02pm Jun 22, 2001 EST (#5824
of 5846) Robert Showalter
showalte@macc.wisc.edu
I don't think reprisals are hard to find.
But the mechanics of those reprisals bear examination.
The press needs to take steps to get itself more independence.
Advertisers, by and large, would be glad to see it -- it hurts
them to have the press so little respected. That lowers the value of
adds.
lunarchick
- 06:04pm Jun 22, 2001 EST (#5825
of 5846) lunarchick@www.com
see
10
rshowalter
- 06:08pm Jun 22, 2001 EST (#5826
of 5846) Robert Showalter
showalte@macc.wisc.edu
The internet, with its vastly increased memory, and
interconnection to document complexity -- can help with the problems
in "see 10" above -- that is, can supplement the effective
intelligence of individuals and groups, and permit things to be
checked.
lunarchick
- 06:09pm Jun 22, 2001 EST (#5827
of 5846) lunarchick@www.com
Kissenger-BOSNIA
lunarchick
- 06:11pm Jun 22, 2001 EST (#5828
of 5846) lunarchick@www.com
http://www.jps.net/drboylan/mj12org.htm
(18
following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Missile Defense
|