New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Russian military leaders have expressed concern about US plans
for a national missile defense system. Will defense technology be
limited by possibilities for a strategic imbalance? Is this just SDI
all over again?
(5003 previous messages)
rshowalter
- 03:39pm Jun 13, 2001 EST (#5004
of 5028) Robert Showalter
showalte@macc.wisc.edu
There would be other negotiations and arrangements that would
have to be made, but this could be done and people could
understand and remember it. MD266 rshowalt
9/25/00 7:32am .... MD267 rshowalt
9/25/00 7:33am MD268 rshowalt
9/25/00 7:35am .... MD269 rshowalt
9/25/00 7:36am
If some other world leaders asked George W. Bush specifically
and in detail why it couldn't be done -- the answers might be
interesting, and might look interesting on videotape.
rshowalter
- 03:42pm Jun 13, 2001 EST (#5005
of 5028) Robert Showalter
showalte@macc.wisc.edu
"rogue nations" -- in the sense the words have been used, and are
used above -- would step into line pretty quickly, I believe.
Assuming some sensible, humanly reasonable talking was done.
And we could spend our resources on other things -
- like getting the world on a sustainable energy
budget -- with renewable energy supplies big enough for us
. . and getting CO2 concentrations controlled --
if the world is industrialized enough now that it needs a "world
excretory system" for C02, we should build one. It wouldn't be
hard to do.
rshowalter
- 03:43pm Jun 13, 2001 EST (#5006
of 5028) Robert Showalter
showalte@macc.wisc.edu
And if the nuclear mess was under better control, I might be able
to get a job . . . and, speaking selfishly, that would be nice.
possumdag
- 03:49pm Jun 13, 2001 EST (#5007
of 5028) Possumdag@excite.com
Showalter, did you read 5001?
If Russia/EU/America are now 'reading off the same page' in the
Bwsh mind .. will the chances of sorting out MD from the Cold War be
improved?
rshowalter
- 03:59pm Jun 13, 2001 EST (#5008
of 5028) Robert Showalter
showalte@macc.wisc.edu
If everybody's "reading off the same page" as far as what the
facts are - - then hard, careful dealmaking can work.
Nobody has to like each other, though goodwill sometimes helps.
alty53
- 04:00pm Jun 13, 2001 EST (#5009
of 5028)
You are absolutely correct when you say that Roosevelt was
attempting to provoke the axis into an attack in order to jump into
WWII on the side of the British (ands its inheritable) empire
particularly after it became clear after WWI that the United States
was the only creditor nation left standing.......but it was the
American people who do the fighting and dying and we Americans were
not going to die in an attempt to grab the British Empire.........we
would fight and die to end Nazi tyranny....and don't kid yourself,
hatred for and fear of Nazism/facism/militarism was a strong
motivating force for my father and his generation.......next, you
have to get out of the habit of thinking in terms of
Demopublicans.....they are nothing more than the janus head party of
Wall Street...whether Clinton bombs Serbia or Bush bombs Iraq or
Reagan bombs Granada, its all the same foreign policy.....Super
power hegemony.......corporate control of the world
economy.....commodification of everything by deconstructing our
common humanity......human beings as aliens to and among our fellow
human beings.............total alienation for the purpose of profit
rshowalter
- 04:03pm Jun 13, 2001 EST (#5010
of 5028) Robert Showalter
showalte@macc.wisc.edu
And a thread like this may be good for getting facts to focus --
or suggesting alternatives -- but not for cutting deals. For that,
the actors who are actually reponsible have to work through problem
only they can fully judge.
But when "meetings of the mind" aren't possible -- dealmaking
isn't possible. So facts, including facts about what happened, have
to be clear -- so people can grope (a suggestive word - ) toward
solutions by incremental feedback-- and checking results,
including feelings.
possumdag
- 04:04pm Jun 13, 2001 EST (#5011
of 5028) Possumdag@excite.com
What do Governments do to young men they pull in to fight dirty
wars ....
Those who knew Timothy personally dispute this, point to his
very normal and happy childhood, and blame the media and
government for demonising McVeigh as the face of terror. They say
his service in Operation Desert Storm turned him against the US
government. He came home a decorated hero, but the experience
changed his views forever. "He saw incredible devastation all
around him
a pathetic enemy who was more interested in
surrendering than fighting
He began to feel that the US government
had set him up, had used him and other earnest young men like him to
undertake a mission that was dishonourable. That
bordered on
genocide. It turned him from a person who fervently believed in the
US to one who was lost." Dick Burr, former lawyer. http://www.abc.net.au/foreign/2001/ep39-10.htm#lead
(17
following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Missile Defense
|