New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Russian military leaders have expressed concern about US plans
for a national missile defense system. Will defense technology be
limited by possibilities for a strategic imbalance? Is this just SDI
all over again?
(3866 previous messages)
almarst-2001
- 09:11pm May 14, 2001 EST (#3867
of 3870)
gisterme
5/14/01 7:58pm
"If that had been the intent it would have happened when
Stalin refused to withdraw from eastern Europe."
There was no chance the US-Britain could turn against Russia at
that point. They would loos hands down and destroy the remainding of
the Europe right away. The US has may be one more bomb to use and
then to lose all its military contigent on the ground. Remember also
that it was according to the Yalta aggreement and US refused to
withdrow from the western Europe. A tit-for-tat you so like as I
remember;)
"Britain first went to war to liberate Poland from one evil
dictator"
Britain went to war to save its Empire. It understood pretty well
the combined forces of Germany, Russia and Japan would put a sure
end to its World's posessions.
"did the treaty that Britain went to war for somehow
dissappear when it was Stalin rather than Hitler occupying Poland,
or did the same war just continue in a different form until Poland
was finally liberated?"
The Britain hoped to put its feets in Europe for a very long time
(having succeedeng only in the Gibraltar), mainly on two places -
the Balkans and the Poland. It tryed once the Crimea, but apparently
lost interest to fight the Russia. The British are very calculative
nation and strived for a cost-effective solutions:)
"Perhaps someone here thinks Stalin's secret treaty with the
Nazis to occupy half of Poland should be the one that's
recognized?"
The Nazis broke that treaty and then disappeared. Otherwise that
one would prabably would be recognised. And how about the not secret
treaty with Japan to occupy the Okinava? Or other places occupied by
the US around the Globe presented as a land-leese payment by the
British in a secret treaty between Rusevelt and Cherchill at the
sea?
"If Britian had known about that treachery, do you think
Russia would have received so much material support from the western
allays?"
The Stalin-Hitler alliance was anti-British first and formost.
The British always dreamed of destroying the Russia and connecting
their Asian colonies from China, India, Pakistan,Afganistan, and
Iran to Balkans and to the Europe, but never had a chance because of
Russia. It was just too big and the dangerows piece to swallow. They
also remembered the Napoleon's fate and the Crimea war way too well.
However, if Britis new about the Hitler-Stalin design, they would
come and give the Russia all it wants to prevent this from
happening. The last thing they wanted is to face both in a war. And
you should know it was a Hitler's design to fight the Britain to
expropriate so to speak some of its colonial treasures. After the
fact, the British worked overtime trying to convince the Hitler it
will be much easier to take the land from Russia then to fight the
Britain all over the world.
Are you trying to present the British Empire as some very
attractive alternative to any other one?;)
"That treaty proves Stalin's desire for empire existed before
Russia was attacked."
And the British desire for empire just disappeared?;)
"If Stalin would betray Poland and her allies he would
certainly betray Germany..."
If the British would betray Chechoslovakia...;)
But seriously, how come Stalin to betray Poland? Do you really
know the Russian-Poland history? Which started much earlier then
Hitler was born. So much earlier... even I don't recall;)
I suggest you start the investigation from there;)
"Not the kind on neighbor one want's at their back door."
That may be a real problem when neighbors start to expand their
houses... untill their back doors hit;)
gisterme
- 09:47pm May 14, 2001 EST (#3868
of 3870)
almarst wrote: ".... Just to compare such a development to the
Chechnia or the Kosovo..."
WRT Chechnya, obviously the Russians don't like the prospect of
losing one of their "states" any more than the US would.
The US has already been through the bloodiest war in its history
over state's rights. Too late for tickets to that. What you don't
seem to understand about the US is that it is a nation of
immigrants. If hispanics wanted to turn California or Texas into
Mexico, they would just go to Mexico instead. It would be much
easier. But those folks are just as proud to be Americans as any
other ethnic group. No different than Russians being proud to be
Russians. If the Serbs and Albanians would adapt the US
Anglo-Hispanic cultural relationsip as a model they wouldn't be
wanting to burn each other out of their homes. Since the US civil
rights revolution in the '60s and '70s we've had far more problems
(crime etc.) within ethnic groups than between them. There have been
tremendous advances in cross-cultural understanding and wide spread
sharing of the best points of all those cultures. The sort of
centuries-old racial bias that existed in the US (and presently
exists in Yugoslavia) can't be changed overnignt by legislation.
Legislation is good as a starting point, but it takes generaions of
"not teaching your father's racial hatred to your children" for such
hatred to dissipate. Passing a law can't change a person's heart.
almarst, do you believe that because two ethnic groups hate each
other that they they have a right to slaughter each other? If you
see two neighbors trying to kill each other, and you have the power
to stop them, should you?...Or should you just let them fight until
one is dead? If you intervene and prevent a killing, eventhough both
parties hate you because of it, would you feel better about yourself
than if you did nothing? Is it ethical to allow a massacre to win a
friend? Would the survivor have respect for you after he knows you
allowed him to kill your neighbor? Would you have respect for
yourself, knowing you could have saved your neighbor (even though
you might not like him)?
(2
following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Missile Defense
|