|
New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Russian military leaders have expressed concern about US plans
for a national missile defense system. Will defense technology be
limited by possibilities for a strategic imbalance? Is this just SDI
all over again?
(3750 previous messages)
zxw2001
- 10:56am May 12, 2001 EST (#3751
of 3760)
I completely support Bush's NMD since: (1). There are many
countries have Nuclear and Missile weapons, they often threat to
attack U.S and others; (2). Unlike U.S and other democratic
countries, some countries are autocratic, a few dictators can decide
war, they do not care their citizen; (3). Some dictators can hire
some terrorists to attack U.S using missile-nuclear weapon; in the
past years, many U.S Embassy are attacked by terrorists, eventhough,
they died also; (4). A few years ago, some dictators already said,
they will attack U.S using their very small missile-nuclear weapon,
every smart American should not forget their words, it is not a
joke, it was published on their official news paper; (5). As early
as 1970's, some countries already did their research to develop
laser weapon, install it in out space to attack other country's
missile and satellites, when our congressmen and some scientists
debate if we need develop NMD or not, some countries already sent
some weapon in out space to test attacking other satellites, if it
is NMD? It is! (6). Old American should remember and teach young
American: in 1957, before first satellite of Russia travelled in out
space, not only all American did not know but also CIA, at that U. S
was behind Russia a few years! If Russian discussed on their
newspaper and Congress if they need to launch satellite or not? No!
May be before US ends her "marathon" debating, some countries
already complete their research how to distroy US missiles and
satellites in out space, it will be too late when they launch NMD
weapons into out space then US end her debating! (7). Old American
should remember and tell young American, what happened in 1961 in
Cuba??? (8). We should discuss NMD with others, especially our
freinds, but the final decision can only be made by US citizen! Who
care the safety of US? only US citizen! (9). We hope our smart
freinds understand: NMD will not only protect US, but also them!
without NMD how they protect themselves from mass missile-nuclear
attack! It is not a joke! So many countries develop missile-nuclear
weapons cost so much money, why? put them in museum? If they do not
care their safety why we do? (10).Unlike democratic countries, in
the dictatorial countries, if some citizen (including of famous
scientists) against their government to develop NMD, they will be
sent to jail or be sent to hell! this is why what they did no body
knows, when we know it is too late; (11). Why some body against U. S
to develop NMD but they did? Because their technology is not as good
as that of U. S, if they have NMD but U. S has no, then they can not
only threat U.S. but also our freinds! Wake up American!!! (12).
Yes, there are a lot of technic problem need to be solve for NMD,
but if we do our best we can solve them absolutely, it is too late,
when missile fall into New York city then we wake up and say:" oh!
my God! what happen!?" (13). Yes, NMD is very expensive, but we need
to think about: money is more valuable or our life is more valuable?
(14). Supporting Bush, he is a nice and a responsible American
President, when mass missile attacking happening, it will not just
kill republicans, missiles do not
zxw2001
- 11:22am May 12, 2001 EST (#3752
of 3760)
Thanks! Possumdag. I will do it again!
zxw2001
- 11:25am May 12, 2001 EST (#3753
of 3760)
I completely support Bush's NMD since: (1). There are many
countries have Nuclear and Missile weapons, they often threat to
attack U.S and others; (2). Unlike U.S and other democratic
countries, some countries are autocratic, a few dictators can decide
war, they do not care their citizen; (3). Some dictators can hire
some terrorists to attack U.S using missile-nuclear weapon; in the
past years, many U.S Embassy are attacked by terrorists, eventhough,
they died also; (4). A few years ago, some dictators already said,
they will attack U.S using their very small missile-nuclear weapon,
every smart American should not forget their words, it is not a
joke, it was published on their official news paper; (5). As early
as 1970's, some countries already did their research to develop
laser weapon, install it in out space to attack other country's
missile and satellites, when our congressmen and some scientists
debate if we need develop NMD or not, some countries already sent
some weapon in out space to test attacking other satellites, if it
is NMD? It is! (6). Old American should remember and teach young
American: in 1957, before first satellite of Russia travelled in out
space, not only all American did not know but also CIA, at that U. S
was behind Russia a few years! If Russian discussed on their
newspaper and Congress if they need to launch satellite or not? No!
May be before US ends her "marathon" debating, some countries
already complete their research how to distroy US missiles and
satellites in out space, it will be too late when they launch NMD
weapons into out space then US end her debating! (7). Old American
should remember and tell young American, what happened in 1961 in
Cuba??? (8). We should discuss NMD with others, especially our
freinds, but the final decision can only be made by US citizen! Who
care the safety of US? only US citizen! (9). We hope our smart
freinds understand: NMD will not only protect US, but also them!
without NMD how they protect themselves from mass missile-nuclear
attack! It is not a joke! So many countries develop missile-nuclear
weapons cost so much money, why? put them in museum? If they do not
care their safety why we do? (10).Unlike democratic countries, in
the dictatorial countries, if some citizen (including of famous
scientists) against their government to develop NMD, they will be
sent to jail or be sent to hell! this is why what they did no body
knows, when we know it is too late; (Continue in next post)
(7
following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Missile Defense
|