New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Russian military leaders have expressed concern about US plans
for a national missile defense system. Will defense technology be
limited by possibilities for a strategic imbalance? Is this just SDI
all over again?
(3601 previous messages)
rshowalter
- 11:59am May 9, 2001 EST (#3602
of 3639) Robert Showalter
showalte@macc.wisc.edu
Almost whatever the US does, if the rest of the major powers
respond rationally, and with human sophistication, things will work
out well.
There are many things to be said against the US so far as our
military history and current policies may go -- but the US is NOT
about to make a strike with nuclear weapons -- and even at this
administration's crazy and crazed worst, would not do so without
stupid actions on the part of others that ought to be avoided, and
ought to be easily avoidable.
A key point, with respect to US action, is US politics -- it
makes sense for other nations to act peacefully -- to be worthy of
respect, and not belligerent --- so that voters and their
representatives see that. Russia is far more respected and
less feared in America than she was even three months ago. China
could make a similar change, and perhaps as quickly.
Steps are being taken that might finally get China, the Koreas,
Japan, and other nations past the hatreds and injustices of World
War II.
All over the world, in specific, detailed ways, peace may break
out.
If that goes on a while, US voters will see. And "rogues" will be
less of a concern.
Terrorism would be much easier to contain, and less motivated, in
such a world.
rshowalter
- 12:06pm May 9, 2001 EST (#3603
of 3639) Robert Showalter
showalte@macc.wisc.edu
In negotiations, you need plusses and minuses together. One way
to describe it is the old story, about motivating mules, using "a
carrot and a stick."
H.L. Menken, writing about Jusice Holmes, said that he saw that
"if one way to enforce the law was to use a stick -- another was
to use a feather."
Tickling is nicer than bludgeoning.
Both have their uses.
- - -
After other countries get clear that they've communicated their
displeasure about some things the US has done --- how 'bout making
clear some of the good things about America?
There are plenty of good things about America. Even a N. Korean
heir apparent tried to take his kid to Disneyland.
After a whallop, in a while, how 'bout a kiss?
Might work wonders, both with the administration and with the
electorate.
possumdag
- 03:33pm May 9, 2001 EST (#3604
of 3639) Possumdag@excite.com
Can we go back to the 'Vision 20-20' document ... sounds like
a Strategic Management report ... authoured by, was it Rumsfeld?
The 20-20 aspect has two aspects, vision - as in
seeing equally - by both eyes; and 20-20 as in 2020
(year-time).
If the latter then i'd be looking for 2 decades of expenditure
.... reaping profit to the Repub-right-winger sitting on the
boards of companies re military investment.
possumdag
- 04:00pm May 9, 2001 EST (#3605
of 3639) Possumdag@excite.com
A poster here was once referred to as 'an
intellectual'
ohducks
- 04:21pm May 9, 2001 EST (#3606
of 3639)
When Bush has spent billions making a missle defense system
terrorists will laugh. they have only to use biological diseases
brought into this country in small amounts and released in texas, on
plants and animals. The United States would be much better off
spending the billions to ward off global warming, unclean water,and
for new technology for transportation and energy that doesn't use
fossil fuels. Unfortunately Americans are spoiled with their greed
for huge vechicles, bigger and bigger homes, and more toys. Budda
said, " man's grasping and grabbing is the cause of all his
discontent". Our children are bored, left to raise themselves and
see material things as the goals in life. Somehow a lot of grasping
and grabbing people have forgotten that life is finite. And the only
thing that truly matters is how we treat others,and only what we
actually feel in our hearts. If our mouths speak oh I really like
you and our hearts are saying I can't stand you because you are
inferior, fat, ugly, not as rich as me, etc. then it is what your
heart said that is heard and recorded for our eternal records. The
world would be better off without all the added stress of the United
States flexing its muscles in space. In fact the rest of the world
will resent us for doing so. But then all great nations have
crumbled and disappeared into history when decadance, and greed
became their focus instead of peace and understanding.
gisterme
- 04:29pm May 9, 2001 EST (#3607
of 3639)
alarmst wrote: "...gisterme, do you justify the "liberation" by
death?..."
Of course not, almarst. These days, there aren't many places that
need "liberation" in the classical sense because there aren't any
empires that are unilaterally imposing their will by military force.
That's good.
I agree with you that the UN intervention in Kosovo has been a
BIG mistake. One can't adjust delicate watch mechanisms with
chainsaws. On the other hand it was apparently too hard for the rest
of the world to stand by and watch the Serbs slaughter the Kosovar
Alabanians or drive them out of their homes. A tough problem. Far
more Albanians had already been killed in the Serb invasion of
Kosovo than the number of Serbs killed in subsequent UN bombing.
What should one do? Just let it happen? Try something to stop it?
The bottom line is, that whether the peace keepers remain in
Kosovo for a day or 50 years, bombing or no bombing, outside
intervention will not eliminate the tribal enmity that exists
between the Serbs and Albanians. Those kinds of situations can only
be solved when the folks involved can find their own "moments of
grace".
Let's hope some lessons are learned from the debacle.
possumdag
- 04:56pm May 9, 2001 EST (#3608
of 3639) Possumdag@excite.com
Wasn't there a post (above) that suggested the monitoring of hot
spots, & to intervene - before they blew!
Most often economic discontent and breakdown is evident and rife!
(31
following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Missile Defense
|