Forums

toolbar Click Here



 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Russian military leaders have expressed concern about US plans for a national missile defense system. Will defense technology be limited by possibilities for a strategic imbalance? Is this just SDI all over again?


Earliest MessagesPrevious MessagesRecent MessagesOutline (3340 previous messages)

possumdag - 05:56pm May 5, 2001 EST (#3341 of 3350)
Possumdag@excite.com

Macedonia declares war

artemis130 - 07:59pm May 5, 2001 EST (#3342 of 3350)
caveat venditor

Macedonia declares war

See, if we'd developed a missile umbrella, we could have deployed it in Kosovo, thrown it into reverse and kept all those albanian guerrillas from spilling over into neighboring territories.

artemis130 - 08:02pm May 5, 2001 EST (#3343 of 3350)
caveat venditor

stand corrected " nukular families " :)

nuclear - nukular, realty - reality. What's in a name, anyway.

Maybe when GW was an oil landman, he ran around promoting the GW Bush Reality Company?

rshowalter - 11:03pm May 5, 2001 EST (#3344 of 3350) Delete Message
Robert Showalter showalte@macc.wisc.edu

1793: rshowalter 3/30/01 2:22pm
The objective must be to move away from unnecessary fighting. And away from wholly disproportionate means of threatening, including nuclear weapons. To this end, the past has to be understood. Distinctions between the American government, and the small subset that has made crucial military decisions, needs to be made.

1794: rshowalter 3/30/01 2:24pm
1795: rshowalter 3/30/01 2:34pm
. . . the possibility that a small group of very unpatriotic individuals, ...... may have acted, and may be acting, in deep conflict with the interest of the United States needs to be considered.

rshowalter - 11:05pm May 5, 2001 EST (#3345 of 3350) Delete Message
Robert Showalter showalte@macc.wisc.edu

1796: rshowalter 3/30/01 3:18pm
A very interesting article article http://www.nytimes.com/2001/03/30/science/30NIF.html ; a matter than should not be hard to show; and an interesting conversation I had with some government people.

  • ****

    Problems with complexity ... lunarchick 3/30/01 4:11pm

    And some essential jobs to do ... rshowalter 3/30/01 4:46pm

    rshowalter - 11:06pm May 5, 2001 EST (#3346 of 3350) Delete Message
    Robert Showalter showalte@macc.wisc.edu

    Some links to key postings: ..... rshowalter 3/30/01 6:33pm

    possumdag - 06:40am May 6, 2001 EST (#3347 of 3350)
    Possumdag@excite.com

    I did a post on TedTurner's Cold War (tv-doco) ... the net Nanny must have objected to the name of the guy who gave USA secrets to the USSR in early 1950's . Ted seems interested in limiting MD

    rshowalter - 08:04am May 6, 2001 EST (#3348 of 3350) Delete Message
    Robert Showalter showalte@macc.wisc.edu

    Turner is an admirable figure.

    Slowly but surely, my own credetialling problems, which are due to an unconventional history, are being resolved. As that happens, the chance I have for fruitful contacts with people of Turner's distinction get greater.

    On April 7, I contacted CNN, and they referred me to an individual working on Ted Turner's dealings with respect to Russian Television. After a short conversation, I sent that individual an email, copied in the link below, which contains many links to extensive conversations about the Russian press, on this thread, between "almarst," Dawn Riley, and myself -- exchanges that I hoped would be influential, and that I believe may have been.
    2088: rshowalter 4/8/01 8:30am
    2089: rshowalter 4/8/01 8:30am
    Rereading that email, and the conversations it links to, I'm proud and glad to have been part of the dialog with "almarst".

    In that email letter, I suggested that "almarst" was an individual well connected to Russian government, and perhaps Putin himself -- a point where I may have been wrong. Readers may judge that. The matter could, if need be, be checked. If almarst does not have ties with Russian government circles, he has a viewpoint that, I believe, simulates them in a suggestive way. That has, I think, made it possible for us to work out important things about the logic of US-Russian relations, on this thread. Including matters that must be dealt with for a world where nuclear risks are far, far less than they are now.

    More Messages Unread Messages Recent Messages (2 following messages)

     Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Post Message
     E-mail to Sysop  Your Preferences

     [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense







  • Home | Site Index | Site Search | Forums | Archives | Shopping

    News | Business | International | National | New York Region | NYT Front Page | Obituaries | Politics | Quick News | Sports | Science | Technology/Internet | Weather
    Editorial | Op-Ed

    Features | Arts | Automobiles | Books | Cartoons | Crossword | Games | Job Market | Living | Magazine | Real Estate | Travel | Week in Review

    Help/Feedback | Classifieds | Services | New York Today

    Copyright 2001 The New York Times Company