New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Russian military leaders have expressed concern about US plans
for a national missile defense system. Will defense technology be
limited by possibilities for a strategic imbalance? Is this just SDI
all over again?
(2701 previous messages)
rshowalter
- 10:56am Apr 28, 2001 EST (#2702
of 2707) Robert Showalter
showalte@macc.wisc.edu
Weinberger continues:
" Many factors can impair the capacity of the prefrontal cortex
to serve its full impulse-control function: for example,
neurological diseases that kill cells in the prefrontal cortex, head
injuries that damage these cells, alcohol and drugs that impair
their function, and biological immaturity.
"The inhibitory functions are not present at birth; it takes
many years for the necessary biological processes to hone a
prefrontal cortex into an effective, efficient executive. These
processes are now being identified by scientific research. They
involve how nerve cells communicate with each other, how they form
interactive networks to handle complex computational tasks and how
they respond to experience. It takes at least two decades to form a
fully functional prefrontal cortex.
" Scientists have shown that the pace of the biological
refinements quickens considerably in late adolescence, as the brain
makes a final maturational push to tackle the exigencies of
independent adult life. b But the evidence is unequivocal that the
prefrontal cortex of a 15-year-old is biologically immature. The
connections are not final, the networks are still being strengthened
and the full capacity for inhibitory control is still years away.
( Odds are good, that in the population of
personnel controlling nuclear weapons, there are immature
prefrontal cortices, as well. )
" The 15-year-old brain does not have the biological machinery to
inhibit impulses in the service of long-range planning. This is why
it is important for adults to help children make plans and set
rules, and why institutions are created to impose limits on behavior
that children are incapable of limiting. Parents provide their
children with a lend-lease prefrontal cortex during all those years
that it takes to grow one, particularly when the inner urges for
impulsive action intensify.
( None of us, as animals, are "adult" enough to
handle nuclear weapons. What might Bob Kerrey, a good animal, have
done, under great stress, if he'd had a nuclear weapon ? What
might you, or many people you know do ? )
" Adolescents have always had to deal with feeling hurt, ashamed
and powerless. In the face of ridicule, they may want revenge.
Thirty years ago, a teenager in this position might have started a
fight, maybe even pulled a knife. If he was afraid that he could not
defend himself, he might have recruited a tough guy to help him out.
One way or another, he would have tried to teach his tormentors a
lesson. Very likely, however, no one would have died.
" But times have changed, and now this angry teenager lives in a
culture that romanticizes gunplay, and he may well have access to
guns.
( And military forces, trained to maximize force,
have nuclear weapons. )
" I doubt that most school shooters intend to kill, in the adult
sense of permanently ending a life and paying the price for the rest
of their own lives. Such intention would require a fully developed
prefrontal cortex, which could anticipate the future and rationally
appreciate cause and effect. The young school shooter probably does
not think about the specifics of shooting at all. The often reported
lack of apparent remorse illustrates how unreal the reality is to
these teenagers.
( The same can be said of bombing crew. And would
be true of button pushers. )
" This brief lesson in brain development is not meant to absolve
criminal behavior or make the horrors any less unconscionable. But
the shooter at Santana High, like other adolescents, needed people
or institutions to prevent him from being in a potentially deadly
situation where his immature brain was left to its own devices. No
matter what the town or the school, if a gun is put in the control
of the prefrontal cortex of a hurt and vengeful 15-year-old, and it
is pointed at a human target, it will very likely go off.
( Gorbecheve made a related point, when he said,
wi
rshowalter
- 10:58am Apr 28, 2001 EST (#2703
of 2707) Robert Showalter
showalte@macc.wisc.edu
( Gorbecheve made a related point, when he said,
with respect to nuclear weapons, that "Even an unloaded gun
goes off every once in a while. ... )
Daniel R. Weinberger is director of the Clinical Brain
Disorders Laboratory at the National Institutes of Health.
*********
*********
And even if the people were perfect, the controls are
very, very, imperfect. Terrifyingly unstable. And no longer well
understood.
rshowalter
- 11:03am Apr 28, 2001 EST (#2704
of 2707) Robert Showalter
showalte@macc.wisc.edu
691-692" A beautiful essay by Dawn Riley: Quotations from the
universe next door: edevershed
2/16/01 1:26am
rshowalter
- 11:04am Apr 28, 2001 EST (#2705
of 2707) Robert Showalter
showalte@macc.wisc.edu
rshowalter
2/16/01 1:29pm Stanley Milgrams experiment ought to be
required reading for all trying to form judgements about the
probable "rationality" of our current nuclear arrangements. http://www.cba.uri.edu/Faculty/dellabitta/mr415s98/EthicEtcLinks/Milgram.htm
(2
following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Missile Defense
|