New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Russian military leaders have expressed concern about US plans
for a national missile defense system. Will defense technology be
limited by possibilities for a strategic imbalance? Is this just SDI
all over again?
(2273 previous messages)
almarst-2001
- 09:29pm Apr 15, 2001 EST (#2274
of 2276)
On a Media.
While http://www.nytimes.com/2001/04/15/opinion/15SUN1.html
is by far more substantial then what (see him smiling) Mr. Friedman
had to say, nevertheless it is very close to what I would call the
Propaganda.
In my view, the difference between News, Oppinion and Propaganda
is as follows:
The News honestly presents ALL THE KNOWN FACTS,
while indicating the DEGREE of the SOURCE's CREDIBILITY and
POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTERESTS
The Oppinion , while always SUBJECTIVE, nevertheless is
BASED ON ALL THE KNOWN NEWS. The degree of credibility may
not be present but a GOOD HONEST OPPINION should be expected
to THREAD THE FACTS ACCORDING TO THEIR CREDIBILITY
The Propaganda is EVERYTHING ELSE
rshowalter
- 09:52pm Apr 15, 2001 EST (#2275
of 2276) Robert Showalter
showalte@macc.wisc.edu
You'll have a helluva time finding "news" as you define
it, in any country.
You'll NEVER find any country meeting your standard consistently
- and I don't think it can be done, though it is a fine ideal.
An ideal that some, including most people at they NYT ... try to
achieve.
Journalists give their opinions, and try to match the
facts they understand, out of a sense of craftmanship and pride.
There are degrees of "propaganda" -- and in the world we live in,
populated by beings (pardon the religious note, but it is Easter) "a
little lower than the angels" a key issue is how are feedbacks
and checking processes set up so that mistakes are corrected ?
Mistakes are inevitable, some "perfectly honest" some distorted
in various ways, for reasons that may be "innocent" or less so.
The question, again and again is how do you
check?
If Russia can do better than the US has done (and the NYT is
far above the common standard of US journalism) you'll have
served not only the interests of Russia, but the interests of the
whole world.
With the new technical resources, I think Russia CAN do better,
in important ways.
A free press, for all its faults, is something complex societies
need. Even though, for all sorts of reasons, such a press will have
plenty of "propaganda" as either you or I would define it.
rshowalter
- 09:54pm Apr 15, 2001 EST (#2276
of 2276) Robert Showalter
showalte@macc.wisc.edu
I'm off for the night.
New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Missile Defense
Enter your response, then click the POST MY MESSAGE
button below. See the quick-edit
help for more information.
|