New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's
war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars"
defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make
the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an
application of science be successful? Is a militarized space
inevitable, necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a
new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every
Thursday.
(11791 previous messages)
mazza9
- 12:59am Feb 24, 2002 EST (#11792
of 11808) Louis Mazza
lchic:
You speak of lies and yet you spread this unsubstanitated
propaganda. 1984? Newspeak? Way to go!
LouMazza
lchic
- 06:06am Feb 24, 2002 EST (#11793
of 11808)
1984 is a novel
A damatisation of it held the memorable catchphrase words
"Big Brother is Watching You!"
He's watching you too mAzzA - take care!
almarst-2001
- 09:32am Feb 24, 2002 EST (#11794
of 11808)
"Way to go"
And go we do.
almarst-2001
- 09:44am Feb 24, 2002 EST (#11795
of 11808)
The Politics of Dead Children - http://www.reason.com/0203/fe.mw.the.shtml
almarst-2001
- 12:25pm Feb 24, 2002 EST (#11796
of 11808)
Blair and Bush to plot war on Iraq - http://www.guardian.co.uk/Observer/international/story/0,6903,656231,00.html
almarst-2001
- 12:48pm Feb 24, 2002 EST (#11797
of 11808)
Former MP and peace campaigner Tony Benn - http://politicstalk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?50@@.ee97c9f/1
"Since 1949 the Americans have bombed China, Korea, Guatemala,
Indonesia, Cuba, The Congo, Peru, Laos, Vietnam, Cambodia, Grenada,
Libya, El Salvador, Panama, Iraq, The Sudan, Afghanistan, Iran and
Yugoslavia.
Dropping cluster bombs and TV dinners ain't humanitarian."
A senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International
Peace in Washington, Mr Lieven has just returned from Pakistan. He
was the Times corresponent in Moscow (1990-96) and covered Pakistan
and Afghanistan for the Times in 1988-89. - http://books.guardian.co.uk/lrb/articles/0,6109,559135,00.html
"Two things were particularly striking here: a tendency to
divide the world into friends and enemies, and a difficulty verging
on autism when it came to international opinions that didn't
coincide with their own - a combination more appropriate to the
inhabitants of an ethnic slum in the Balkans than to people who
were, at that point, on top of the world."
mazza9
- 04:30pm Feb 24, 2002 EST (#11798
of 11808) Louis Mazza
almarst-2001
"Since 1949 the Americans have bombed China, Korea, Guatemala,
Indonesia, Cuba,The Congo, Peru, Laos, Vietnam, Cambodia, Grenada,
Libya, El Salvador, Panama,Iraq, The Sudan, Afghanistan, Iran and
Yugoslavia."
What does this have to do with missile defense?
There was a reason for these various conflicts and to lump them
into one sentence is sophomoric.
LouMazza
rshowalt
- 07:26pm Feb 24, 2002 EST (#11799
of 11808)
Technically, missile defense makes no sense, but huge money flows
rest on maintaining fictions about how workable it is -- and isn't.
And when you look at the fictions - and how they distort US foreign
policy, there's reason for plenty of concern - and quotes from 1984
seem on point.
What happens when HUGE economic or political interests depend
fundamentally on fictions?
Some very bad thing can happen -- and the 20th century shows
plenty of examples.
Technical truth matters - both for directly technical reasons --
and because of what the "missile defense" program stands for.
almarst-2001
- 10:01pm Feb 24, 2002 EST (#11800
of 11808)
"What does this have to do with missile defense?"
It does, if the reason for missile defense is to allow
continuation of such policy. Which I am firmly against.
mazza9
- 10:07pm Feb 24, 2002 EST (#11801
of 11808) Louis Mazza
RShowalt:
This afternoon after the Olympic hockey finals I tuned into the
History Channel and watched the episode on Battleships.
What we have been discussing here parallels the developement of
the dreadnought and the attempts to control that weapon through
treaties and international law. It didn't work.
The possibility that Missile Defense might deter the development
of ICBMs and weapons of mass destruction might justify the
expenditure.
You've referred to the lies, subterfuges and plain old
shenanigans that make up International Affairs. Yep! that's the
human condition at work. Try as you might, there isn't any other
advancement of mankind except by faltering steps.
LouMazza
(7
following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Missile Defense
|