New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's
war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars"
defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make
the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an
application of science be successful? Is a militarized space
inevitable, necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a
new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every
Thursday.
(1344 previous messages)
almarst-2001
- 10:20pm Mar 22, 2001 EST (#1345
of 11890)
In my view, the 72 days and nights of bombing of Serbia had the
very dramatic and negative effect on international relations, arms
race and the American image. For me, this one episode was sufficient
to completely chenge my oppinion on Clinton's presidency.
Little did I care about his personal affairs, even I think it was
very wrong, but for the different reason - he put the president of
the greatest superpower in a danger to be blackmailed. This is
absolutly recless and in my view, deserve impeachement.
But to bomb and destroy the civilian infrustructure of a country,
killing at least 500 civilians and causing the direct damage of
about $60bn, dropping more bombs then this country received during
WWII was plainly criminal.
This was a turning point when a Post-Cold War good will was lost.
And not just of Russia.
rshowalter
- 10:21pm Mar 22, 2001 EST (#1346
of 11890) Robert Showalter mrshowalter@thedawn.com
Some old but powerful work, based on MArkov chains, used in
classified machine translation work in both our countries, when
combined with LSA (latent semantic analysis) would improve the art
in this regard - and current LSA, with good information collection,
is already very good.
Soon, people are going to have to hide almost everything
if they are going to have complex operations go undetected.
Hard to do.
rshowalter
- 10:24pm Mar 22, 2001 EST (#1347
of 11890) Robert Showalter mrshowalter@thedawn.com
almarst_2001 , America, as a nation, needs to be awkened
to the horrors of bombing. We're willing to do it when there's no
adequate justification. I wish I could find extenuating
circumstances here - but don't see any.
rshowalter
- 10:43pm Mar 22, 2001 EST (#1348
of 11890) Robert Showalter mrshowalter@thedawn.com
Microsoft
warned users Thursday that someone posing as a company employee had
obtained access to digital certificates that could be used to pose
as the software giant and deliver a computer virus.
almarst-2001
- 10:46pm Mar 22, 2001 EST (#1349
of 11890)
That event clearly illustrated the need to ensure that aggression
has to have consequences for agressor. That realisation makes
nuclear disarmament at current disballance of conventional power
unrealistic.
Not incidently, just after coming to power (again for the same
reason), Putin modified the Russian military doctrine to permit the
first use of a tactical nuclear wearpons.
If not for this war, may be even American NMD would be seen much
more favorably, rather then an attempt to neutralise the deterrent
one may have against overhelming US conventional military.
rshowalter
- 10:50pm Mar 22, 2001 EST (#1350
of 11890) Robert Showalter mrshowalter@thedawn.com
We need to look, carefully, at how "overwhelming" that US
military is, in the ways that matter.
NO ONE can reasonably be asked to surrender real security. A
workable deal must increase REAL security for all concerned, taking
everything into account.
I think, with this well remembered, nuclear disarmament is
practical. Soon.
rshowalter
- 10:51pm Mar 22, 2001 EST (#1351
of 11890) Robert Showalter mrshowalter@thedawn.com
Just an aside, but not without interest:
Supersecret
NSA Said Falling Behind in Tech Advances - - By REUTERS
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. National Security Agency, which
uses satellites and electronic listening posts to gather
intelligence globally, is falling behind in technology, causing deep
concern .....
Rep. Porter Goss, the Florida Republican who chairs the panel,
said the NSA, once a leader in technology, is now lagging behind the
fast pace of advances and is unable to cover all necessary targets
for gathering information and data.
*********
With the patterns of secrecy these folks use, with "need to know
barriers" and AN ALMOST INCREDIBLE OBSTRUCTION OF CHECKING
PROCEDURES -- they are doomed to fall FARTHER and FARTHER behind -
and up against a competent force, they'd look like clowns.
A transition to patterns that do MUCH MORE IN CLEAR at many
levels is going to be necessary.
rshowalter
- 10:53pm Mar 22, 2001 EST (#1352
of 11890) Robert Showalter mrshowalter@thedawn.com
If full nuclear disarmament isn't achievable, reductions, and
improvements in controls, that keep the world intact certainly ought
to be. The current levels and controls are just nuts.
lunarchick
- 11:06pm Mar 22, 2001 EST (#1353
of 11890) lunarchick@www.com
I fipped through back posts.
Catch-ups:
This Lucianne.com is a site for contrived controvacy, yet
seems to have a following that elevates Mrs"w"Bush to a pedestal
while thrashing Mrs"wj"Clinton.
When Showalter mentioned the 10,000 words heard in a day ....
then 'concepts' have to be included. Words alone are 'dictionary'
listings.
Congratulations on becoming a Grandparent Alex, all the more
reason for you to work for peace.
On the culture of lying 1293. The newspapers depend on business
and commerce for advertising revenue and propietors must have linked
more with this aspect of income than with general readerships.
(10537 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Missile Defense
|