New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Nazi engineer and Disney space advisor Wernher Von Braun helped
give us rocket science. Today, the legacy of military aeronautics
has many manifestations from SDI to advanced ballistic missiles. Now
there is a controversial push for a new missile defense system. What
will be the role of missile defense in the new geopolitical climate
and in the new scientific era?
(523 previous messages)
gweiman
- 05:33pm Dec 19, 2000 EST (#524
of 540)
SDI is a total waste of time. Countries like North Korea and Iraq
can inflict great damage to the U.S by smuggling in chemical or bio
weapons that can cause thousand or even millions of deaths. SDI only
destablizes MAD which like it or not has kept us from nuclear war
for over 50 years.
rshowalter
- 08:30am Dec 20, 2000 EST (#525
of 540) Robert Showalter
showalte@macc.wisc.edu
SDI might be fine, if it could be made to work. But that "if"
can't be forgotten.
rshowalter
- 03:17pm Dec 28, 2000 EST (#526
of 540) Robert Showalter
showalte@macc.wisc.edu
In this posting, and some just before, there's discussion of the
work of George W. Hart, work that ought to be essential to efficient
missile defense software, that is almost certainly being ignored. rshowalter
"How the Brain Works" 12/28/00 2:01pm
armel7
- 11:57am Dec 30, 2000 EST (#527
of 540) Science/Health Forums Host
Any comments on W's choice for Sec of Defense? What is the future
of the missile defense system?
Your host, Michael Scott Armel
possumdag
- 03:41pm Dec 30, 2000 EST (#528
of 540) Possumdag@excite.com
Balkans Syndrome: Italian press report the death of the 5th
Italian today. He was a peace keeper in 1995 and exposed to
radiation from depleted URANIUM WEAPONS.
rshowalter
- 04:01pm Dec 30, 2000 EST (#529
of 540) Robert Showalter
showalte@macc.wisc.edu
A lot of Republicans are good businessmen, and competent members
of complex social groups. Maybe there will be more honest bookeeping
here than you think. If a true anti-missile shield were actually
buildable, I'd be all for it - diplomatic and negotiation
complications, and all. But I do not know, and do not now believe,
that any reasonable prospect of such a system exists, or has ever
existed.
When military people say "it is classified - but trust me --
this stuff works, and it is great .." there's been a tendency
for all concerned to accept that. One wonders how often that trust
has been justified, and how long that trust will continue.
One also wonders whether anything about Star Wars (I,II,
III .... n) can be verified, that doesn't come from simple
information from actual tests.
The fact is, on tests that seem much easier than a real attack,
they keep missing.
lunarchick
- 05:59am Dec 31, 2000 EST (#530
of 540) lunarchick@www.com
Nuclear weapons clean-up to cost taxpayers £32bn
Nick Paton Walsh Sunday December 31, 2000
The Ministry of Defence has confirmed that the future cost to the
taxpayer of cleaning up Britain's nuclear defence installations will
be £32 billion. The expensive and complex process of decommissioning
nuclear military facilities once they have aged past safe use is
generally calculated and costed when they are built. In June 1999,
the MoD claimed that the cost would be only £10bn, but a recent
review of the MoD's nuclear facilities by the Treasury said that it
needs to put aside three times as much as that to close down all
nuclear submarines and missiles.
Britain's nuclear weapons programme began 40 years ago, and now
covers 26 submarines and processing and weapons plants.
'The public is entitled to know the real cost of the nation's
nuclear programme - not just the acquisition figure, but how much
the taxpayer will be liable for in years to come,' said Menzies
Campbell, the Liberal Democrat spokesman for defence. 'It seems
extraordinary that the original figure of £10bn could have been so
far out and suggests that there has been no real analysis of what is
required until very recently.
more see http://www.observer.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,6903,416563,00.html
possumdag
- 05:14am Jan 4, 2001 EST (#531
of 540) Possumdag@excite.com
Thread re use of URANIUM BULLETS - Bosnia "No threat to
nationals" 6 Italian Soldiers Dead. Uranium bullets litter war zones
of Europe!!!! http://talk.guardianunlimited.co.uk/WebX?13@@.ee7d839/0
(9
following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Missile Defense
|