New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(9931 previous messages)
lchic
- 11:23am Mar 14, 2003 EST (#
9932 of 9943) ~~~~ It got understood and exposed
~~~~
The US say they'll sidestep the UN
Turn to Bush41 mandate
DEATH
Can only happen to each person
ONCE!
Maimed?
The sentence is a lifetime!
lchic2003
rshow55
- 11:51am Mar 14, 2003 EST (#
9933 of 9943)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click
"rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for
on this thread.
About 250,000 people die a day - and there are many
too many tragedies, after many lives that are far too poor -
far too wrenching. We have to be afraid of consequences of
things done - but worry about the messes that have been and
are continuing, and looming, as well.
9927 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.7UUHaJ4I5vW.1946033@.f28e622/11469
refers to 9895 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.7UUHaJ4I5vW.1946033@.f28e622/11437
, which includes points that I'd continue to make, that I
think have been reinforced by all the confusion, and by
some good decisions that seem to be in process, as well.
By the real standards of power holders, at present
and in the past - Bush and Blair are trying hard - and may be
doing pretty well. I'm optimistic.
Putin is trying hard, too. Russia ought to be looking for
opportunities here - to meet the needs it actually has -
practical and at the level of feelings.
Test question:
If Saddam is dead - would leaders
know what to do?
There are some very good answers - and if leaders
don't know them - they should stop and think hard.
Nobody has to be in too much of a hurry. There's a lot of
damping about - and many key things are pretty stable - in
conditions where good convergence is possible. If people work
well - maybe possible with a miraculous minimum of carnage.
Overall, things look good to me. I'd gotten my body in
pretty good shape, after a long layoff -and have worried and
worked so much, the last ten days - that I stopped exercising.
Just now I feel much better - and so I'm taking a break to get
sweaty.
Some leaders ought to sweat some, too. This is fearful
time. Things could go very right. Or wrong.
mazza9
- 02:50pm Mar 14, 2003 EST (#
9934 of 9943) "Quae cum ita sunt" Caesar's Gallic
Commentaries
robkettenburg03:
I suppose that the implantable chip will enhance the US
Missile Defense program?
gisterme
- 05:03pm Mar 14, 2003 EST (#
9935 of 9943)
rshow55 - 10:45am Mar 14, 2003 EST (# 9933 of ...)
http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.7UUHaJ4I5vW.1946033@40679d@.f28e622/11475
"...Is the meeting adequately staffed?..."
You think an high-raniking enisted man, a graduate student
or a beat reporter would be qualified to judge that???
If if that person's judgement were that the meeting were
not adaquately staffed whom should they call...
you?
Get your feet back on the ground, Robert.
If two presidents and a PM are the prime consultatnts, then
I'd say the meeting is more than adaquately staffed.
How do you think a fly on the wall would improve the
staffing?
bbbuck
- 05:08pm Mar 14, 2003 EST (#
9936 of 9943)
You don't think robcatchaduh22-burg, might have one of
those chips in his head as some kind of test white mouse, do
you?
Just throwing it out there.
gisterme
- 05:08pm Mar 14, 2003 EST (#
9937 of 9943)
Robert -
I doubt that Saddam is dead...but even if he were, then it
would be his sons who are running the show. The bottom line is
that Iraq has not accounted for it's WMD and remains a brutal
dictatorship no matter who is in charge.
Whether Saddam is dead or alive, he or his proxies will not
threaten the world nor will the people of Iraq suffer much
longer.
(6 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|