New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(9744 previous messages)
rshow55
- 10:48am Mar 10, 2003 EST (#
9745 of 9749)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click
"rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for
on this thread.
Ivanov Says Russia Will Veto U.S.-Backed Resolution on
Iraq By REUTERS http://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/10/international/10WIRE-IRAQ.html
MOSCOW (Reuters) - Foreign Minister Igor
Ivanov said Monday Russia would vote against the new draft
U.N. resolution on Iraq, a move that would veto the
U.S.-sponsored measure.
"Russia thinks that now there is no need for
any new U.N. resolutions, and that is why Russia has openly
declared that if the draft that has been submitted for
consideration, and which contains unfulfillable
ultimatum-type demands, will be put to vote, Russia will
vote against this resolution," he said.
Ivanov did not use the word "veto" but a
Russian foreign ministry spokesman confirmed that he meant
exactly that.
Ivanov, speaking at a ceremony at a Moscow
university, said U.N. weapons inspectors needed several more
months to finish their work in Iraq, where they are looking
for suspected weapons of mass destruction.
"Today when we have a real possibility to
answer the outstanding questions and do so not within years,
but within months. This way is real, reliable and it allows
us to resolve the problem through political means and defuse
the Iraqi crisis," he said.
I hope, now, that all the nations at the Security Council
vote as they believe and feel they should.
If the US withdraws the resolution - a statement of
principles by the UN Security Council might well be drafted -
and voted on clearly.
This is a time of enormous hope - if people face
their responsibilities, rather than turn away from them.
almarst2003
- 11:16am Mar 10, 2003 EST (#
9746 of 9749)
The defining moment of this century in my view started at
the end of the last one - the 78 days bombing of Serbia
WITHOUT UN authorization by NATO countries acting against
THEIR OWN charter and fueled by unprecedented ant-Serbian
DEHUMANIZATION compain unprecedented since WWII.
I think the humanity is on accelerating course of
self-destruction.
ElBaradei's report confirmed the following:
"The alleged Iraqi attempt of procuring Niger's uranium
in the late nineties was based on unauthentic documents
supplied by American and British intelligence." - http://yellowtimes.org/article.php?sid=1143
(UPI) -- Some evidence linking Iraq to a nuclear weapons
program appears to have been fabricated, the Washington Post
reported Saturday. The faked evidence was described as a
series of letters between Iraqi agents and officials in Niger.
The correspondence was deemed "not authentic" after careful
scrutiny by U.N. and independent experts, Mohamed ElBaradei,
director-general of the International Atomic Energy Agency,
told the U.N. Security Council.
The documents had been given to the U.N. inspectors by
Britain and reviewed extensively by U.S. intelligence. The
forgers had made relatively crude errors that eventually gave
them away -- including names and titles that did not match up
with the individuals who held office at the time the letters
were purportedly written, the Post report said. - http://jewishworldreview.com/0303/fake_evidence.asp
"These documents — which formed the basis for the
reports of recent uranium transactions between Iraq and Niger
— are in fact not authentic," ElBaradei told the United
Nations on Friday. http://abcnews.go.com/sections/GMA/2020/GMA030310Iraq_weapons_evidence.html
The most recent strain emerged when U.N. nuclear
inspectors concluded last week that U.S. and British claims
about Iraq’s secret nuclear program were based on forged
documents. - http://www.msnbc.com/news/882813.asp
UK nuclear evidence a fake - http://politics.guardian.co.uk/foreignaffairs/story/0,11538,910129,00.html
GISTERME, All the above is for your examination.
Feel free to disregard as a "communist's propaganda";)
almarst2003
- 11:19am Mar 10, 2003 EST (#
9747 of 9749)
Emergency Convergence March 15 to Stop the Countdown;
Tens of Thousands to March on the White House Against the War
Deadline The Politics of Deceit, Diplomacy, Oil and War -
http://www.votenowar.org/
almarst2003
- 11:34am Mar 10, 2003 EST (#
9748 of 9749)
Markets threatened by 'new world disorder' http://www.observer.co.uk/business/story/0,6903,910206,00.html
(1 following message)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|