New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (9565 previous messages)

gisterme - 01:41am Mar 7, 2003 EST (# 9566 of 9569)

lchic - 05:17pm Mar 6, 2003 EST (# 9532 of ...) http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.faSOa6tc4eW.471833@.f28e622/11071

"...Doesn't GWB know the 17th is a sacred day for the Irish!"

Of course he does, lchic! Practically evey town in the country has a St. Patty's day celebration. Don't you have any Irish "down under"?

gisterme - 02:01am Mar 7, 2003 EST (# 9567 of 9569)

"...But I believe that the man [President Bush] is doing the best he can, from where he is - in terms of the organization he has - and with a great deal of concern for doing the right thing.

AS he understands it..."

Well, Robert, as President of the United States, what else would you expect Mr. Bush to do??? The right thing as Mr. Chirac understand it?

What more than our best can any of us do?

Thanks for giving some credit where credit is due.

gisterme - 02:11am Mar 7, 2003 EST (# 9568 of 9569)

lchic - 01:28am Mar 7, 2003 EST (# 9565 of ...) http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.faSOa6tc4eW.471833@.f28e622/11104

"...some people are fooled all of the time."

Yep...and yet some of them still went to Sibera along with the rest who weren't. Go figure.

Stalin was so paranoid that he decimated the Red Army's officer corps just before Hitler attacked! What a shining example of great foresight in leadership.

gisterme - 02:47am Mar 7, 2003 EST (# 9569 of 9569)

Robert -

Here's another dot to connect WRT French motiviation for some of their present morality...

I learned today that France, being one of Saddam's principal trading partners, stands to soon gain contracts to develop oil fields in southern Iraq where it is thought that about 25% of Iraq's oil reserves lie.

No doubt one reason the French don't want war is so they won't have to fairly compete with anybody but the Russians for that work. Looks to me like oil profits might be at the heart of some of their motivation. Never mind that some free-market competition would get the best possible deal for the Iraqi people.

Also, I understand, most of the cars sold in Iraq today are French...they seem to have sort of a captive market going there.

What price liberty indeed? Apparantly the French would rather risk WMD-armed terrorists and let the Iraqi people continue to suffer than risk exposing their cash-cow to an environment of fair market competition.

The light comes on.

The French government simply doesn't give a sh!t about anybody but themselves. They're probably hoping that their position in the world will be improved if terrible things happen in the US and UK...just as sort of a side benefit. After all, they'd reason, if they're giving Saddam things he needs to feed his megalomania, why should they be a primary terrorist target?

Makes me think of the story of the little boy who found a magnifying glass...and when looking through it at his willy, decided he was a big man. So he took his BB gun and went out hunting mountain lions...was never seen again.

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense


Enter your response, then click the POST MY MESSAGE button below.
See the
quick-edit help for more information.

Message:






Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us