New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(9560 previous messages)
lchic
- 12:10am Mar 7, 2003 EST (#
9561 of 9569) ~~~~ It got understood and exposed
~~~~
B I G -- QUESTION --- What's this war 'about' ??
Looking at Palestine/Israel one notes America gives was
it $10m per day to the latter to buy guns, to aquire land
and build walls around the water supply - denying others.
So will Israel be moving into Iraq to build walls around
the twin rivers and pipe off the water back to Israel ?
What is this war 'about' ?
One aspect mooted is that it provides an outlet for the
US military to 'win medals', gain promotions, and 'feel big
about themselves'; along with blasting off munitions ---
that then have to be replenished ... by companies such as
Carlyle that Old-Bush sits atop of. What is this war
'about' ?
Control of oil supplies -- to ensure oil -- or to create
panic that pushes up prices at the pump giving shareholders
in oil large dividends ... when the oil supply hasn't been
interrupted. What is this war 'about' ?
A chance for the Monroe Doctor to sojourn abroad ?
What is this war 'about' ?
Is it a chance for those with a 'lidded' virtual pattern
of religion to set hellfire and brimstone on those they
consider 'others'. What is this war 'about' ?
Is the question the world is asking. What is this war
'about' ?
Take the capital labour model of yore -- there was
always a fight -- but that was then C19 C20
The new model invokes contractual responsibilities --
the new worker has a foot in both camps -- and is everybody.
Everybody knows that aggression and fights don't get
folks that far. The new model if for all to have vision, an
eye on the horizon, on the future, on tomorrow with an
understanding of the journey and where the journey will take
us. So WHAT is this WAR 'about' ?
Will it end in the usual way ... with the US leaving
thousands of unexploded bombs for the children to stumble
over ?
Has the US considered that Old Europe is tired of
picking up the pieces, of integrating refugees -- some of
whom have their own mafia culture -- and will never fit into
decent society see [DW - on Catherine the Great's folks
returning to Germany - today ]
lchic
- 12:16am Mar 7, 2003 EST (#
9562 of 9569) ~~~~ It got understood and exposed
~~~~
GU talk - middle east
US insisted on inspections, but israei govt didn't
co-operate fully. Surely then after 4 decades war is the only
viable option?
http://www.mepc.org/public_asp/journal_vol7/0002_rubner.asp
The credibility of the US and the inspection teams is at
stake.
Surely 4 decades is enough time?
http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?50@@.4a90dc8c/0
gisterme
- 12:58am Mar 7, 2003 EST (#
9563 of 9569)
lchic - 06:41am Mar 2, 2003 EST (# 9404 of ...) http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.faSOa6tc4eW.471828@.f28e622/10942
"...Supposing Stalin was as MAD as a HATTER ...
Why did so many OTHERS enable his tyranny? "
Umm, do you suppose it's because they didn't care to
spend the rest of their lives in Siberia (or worse)?
gisterme
- 01:24am Mar 7, 2003 EST (#
9564 of 9569)
Lou and Fred...here's one:
A young lady in skin-tight leather pants saunters into a
bar and hoists herself up onto a stool.
The gentleman who happens to be sitting on the next stool
took all this in and was sincerely amazed at how tightly the
leather pants fit the young woman.
After getting over his initial amazement, he inquires of
her, "How in the world do you get into those pants?"
She immediately replies, "Well, you could start by buying
me a drink!"
lchic
- 01:28am Mar 7, 2003 EST (#
9565 of 9569) ~~~~ It got understood and exposed
~~~~
... even so ... some Russians today still say ... 'if only
we could have talked to Stalin ... he wouldn't let these
'officials' treat us like this ... because Stalin is a good
leader ...
Some Russians still think he was great! Well there were
large statues of the man - everywhere ... he must have been
great ?
And that's the problem --- people expect leaders to lead,
to be great, to be flawless, to do the right thing ... that's
why there are BIG statues ...
So goes the thinking ... some people are fooled all of the
time.
(4 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|