New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (9392 previous messages)

rshow55 - 11:47am Mar 1, 2003 EST (# 9393 of 9401) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

Do people who, by what they say, seem connected to power notice what is written here? Gisterme seems a likely example. Almarst , as well.

3091 rshow55 7/16/02 8:19am includes this. <a href="/webin/WebX?14@28.tF6Oayxr4GR.673772@.f28e622/3856">rshow55 7/16/02 7:19am</a>

" There's a problem with long and complex. And another problem with short. . . . . The long and the short of it, I think, is that you need both long and short."

From the long, quite often, the short condenses.

We need both long and short statements and this thread, which has been going on - is an effort to move some key things - matters of life and death - into focus. http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.tF6Oayxr4GR.673772@.f28e622/4168

I think this forum has probably already made a contribution to the culture - involving the concept of "connecting the dots" - 9238 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.tF6Oayxr4GR.673772@.f28e622/10764 a notion that Secretary Rumsfeld and many other ranking people now use frequently.

To see a summary of this thread, click "rshow55" at the top left of my postings.

In addition to this thread, and in coordination with it, lchic and I post on Guardian Talk threads. Here are threads I use and appreciate very much - that often refer to this thread -and sometimes summarize it more compactly. The links below connect to postings I've made today, or recently.

http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163 International/ Psychwarfare, Casablanca -- and terror

http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7726f Science/ Paradigm Shift .... whose getting there?

http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7b085 Issues/ Mankind's Inhumanity to Man and Woman - As natural as human goodness?

http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7b2bd Issues/ God is the Projection of Mans Unrealised Potential - Discuss

http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a59d Environment/ how long do you give this planet of ours?

http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee9b7ef Politics talk/Europe and the world/ Fortress America?

http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7f95f Politics talk/Manifesto/ "8th March : Wimmin" Manifesto

http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee81376 Science/ The Worlds Nicest Equation ?

http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee81cf9 Science/ Language is instinctual

http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee79f4e The arts/ There's Always Poetry

http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7b23c What's the best advice you've ever been given?

Is the work worth it? I've felt so. If the points we're dealing with here - especially about issues of fact - and procedures for getting facts clear - were checked to closure - we'd live in a far, far safer world.

I opened 2003 on this board with 7177 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.tF6Oayxr4GR.673772@.f28e622/8700

"I think this is a year where some lessons are going to have to be learned about stability and function of international systems, in terms of basic requirements of order , symmetry , and harmony - at the levels that make sense - and learned clearly and explicitly enough to produce systems that have these properties by design, not by chance."

If people with real influence wanted to check the claims about facts and relations on this board, according to procdures set out, for instance, in http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/296 , I believe that ought to be possible.

lchic - 01:05pm Mar 1, 2003 EST (# 9394 of 9401)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Turkey says 'yes' by a small majority .... but ... challenged

A constitutional wrangle in Turkish Parliament!

Victory was defeat --- 3 votes short of majority needed

The Parliament will vote again on March 4

__________

Pres of UAE says 'Step Down Saddam!'

lchic - 01:08pm Mar 1, 2003 EST (# 9395 of 9401)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=Parliament

More Messages Recent Messages (6 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us