New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(9328 previous messages)
rshow55
- 04:02pm Feb 27, 2003 EST (#
9329 of 9340)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click
"rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for
on this thread.
re wrcooper , 9324 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.breoazby4Gc.341925@.f28e622/10858
People draw conclusions - "connect the dots" on the basis
of what they know and believe, the way they happen to know it
and believe it - and if anybody thinks that process is
infallible - I surely don't. Not when I do it. Not when
anybody else does it.
On the basis of information and inferences that seemed
reasonable at the time, and still seem reasonable in
retrospect - I guessed that Cooper might be George Johnson -
and turned out to be wrong on that particular point -
something that I believe I made clear on this thread.
When my wife and I met with Cooper - we had some points of
contact - but I left feeling - and my wife left feeling very
strongly - that Cooper had been dishonest and irresponsible on
some key points - a feeling that was reinforced on seeing his
posted description of the meeting.
My last contact with Cooper was an email that read as
follows, and expressed my feelings, and hers:
- - - -
Will,
Attribution of insanity is a serious
business.
You worked at it. It wasn't an afterthought
or a mistake.
Do you know what that does to people, as a
practical matter?
I bet you do.
I'm glad to have you "best wishes" to the
extent they are sincere.
I'll be responding some more. I didn't mean
a physical attack - but I will say more about what I did
mean.
I don't think that you can do the things
you've done, and not take responsibility for them. Just as
other people are expected to take responsibility for what
they do.
I do.
I'll be back to you.
Bob
- - -
I didn't get back to Cooper. I thought about doing so - and
didn't think, on balance, that it was worthwhile, nor did I
feel particularly obligated. Perhaps that was a mistake.
If Cooper wants to call me and discuss the matter in more
detail - and pursue the matter further - he can call me.
rshow55
- 04:05pm Feb 27, 2003 EST (#
9330 of 9340)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click
"rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for
on this thread.
Fred Rogers, Host of 'Mister Rogers' Neighborhood,' Dies
at 74 By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS http://www.nytimes.com/2003/02/27/obituaries/27WEB-ROGE.html
"His message remained a simple one
throughout the years, telling his viewers to love themselves
and others. On each show, he would take his audience on a
magical trolley ride into the Neighborhood of Make-Believe,
where his puppet creations would interact with each other
and adults.
During the Persian Gulf War, Rogers told
youngsters that "all children shall be well taken care of in
this neighborhood and beyond -- in times of war and in times
of peace," and he asked parents to promise their children
they would always be safe.
Rogers was a master at explaining things to children in
ways that actually worked - and knew how afraid kids actually
were. I wonder how much of the argument about missile defense,
or the invasion of Iraq - Rogers could have put across to his
charges effectively? Maybe a lot. The most basic things - the
most important things - are simple.
Rogers was great at finding ways to say "here, look for
yourself" that worked for kids.
Here is a "connecting of the dots" that I liked when I
wrote it yesterday - and I feel - though people would have to
check and see how it seems to them:
. We ought to think about the behavior
set out in http://www.uwinnipeg.ca/~epritch1/social98a.html
and realize that if we're "wired to be nice" -
that is - to be cooperative - we're also "wired to be
self deceptive and stupid" whenever the immediate
thought seems to go against our cooperative needs.
9314 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.breoazby4Gc.341925@.f28e622/10848
That seems to me to explain some things succinctly. Maybe
others disagree - and maybe I'd disagree, too - if I
considered it more - and checked how the idea, which seems
simple and right now, actually works. It seems good now.
lchic
- 04:06pm Feb 27, 2003 EST (#
9331 of 9340) ~~~~ It got understood and exposed
~~~~
Australian Defense Minister -- background Lawyer.
Australian Prime Minister -- background Lawyer.
Say 'Let's join Son-of-Starwars'
Australian Opposition --- Listening to American Military
Figures who say it's most often useless ... say 'Let's NOT'!
(9 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|