New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(9314 previous messages)
gisterme
- 02:47am Feb 27, 2003 EST (#
9315 of 9316)
rshow55 - 07:11pm Feb 26, 2003 EST (# 9314 of ...) http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.AmYZacvC4T6.210829@.f28e622/10848
"...On this thread, again and again, there have been
technical arguments - and with absolutely stunning, monotonous
regularity - gisterme presents arguments that make no
technical sense at all - that are perversely wrong - and feels
right about them..."
That statement would be correct only if one were to
substitue "Showalter" for gisterme. I invite anybody to
check the record.
"...That's because gisterme tends to "believe what he
wants to believe"..."
Are you implying that you don't believe what you
want to believe, Robert, or are you just being hyporcitical?
Heh, heh. That must mean that you only believe what you
don't want to believe or that you don't believe
anything at all. Which is it?
You make me think of the "contrary" indian character in the
movie Little Big Man...he rode his horse backward, bathed in
dirt, dried in the river... :-)
"... - and is dependent on staffs that fear him - and
have been "pleasing the boss" rather than getting right
answers for a long time..."
That statement is proof that you're the one who's
believing what he wants to believe, you hyprocrite! You know
that statement is not the truth. I've told you myself, many
times. Why do you insist on propagating such a falsehood? Not
only do you believe only what you want to believe, but you
don't believe what you don't want to hear even when
it's the truth. ;-)
I have no staff(s), nobody fears me (except apparantly you)
and I'm nobody's boss, Robert. I can't think of a single
person who knows me that I don't get along with, and most I
count as friends.
So far as monotony goes, you're the master of it,
Robert. I can't imagine why anybody would bother, but if they
wanted to they could look back through this thread and see the
same baseless (and in my opinion mindless) crap repeated over
and over and over in your posts. Even though it doesn't make
any sense, you still repeat it! Why? Is that a dot somebody
should be trying to connect?
Only a few days ago, fredmoore compressed virtually all
you've said on this thread in thousands of posts into one
paragraph! I'm still impressed. :-)
gisterme
- 02:52am Feb 27, 2003 EST (#
9316 of 9316)
mazza9 - 11:44am Feb 26, 2003 EST (# 9302 of ...) http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.AmYZacvC4T6.210829@.f28e622/10836
"...Well done my friend...."
Thanks for the kind words, Lou...but, they obviously still
don't "get it".
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
Enter your response, then click the POST MY
MESSAGE button below. See the quick-edit
help for more information.
|