New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (9305 previous messages)

rshow55 - 01:29pm Feb 26, 2003 EST (# 9306 of 9309) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

Almarst , no one has to believe - without checking. And checking in expensive. But sometimes, not checking is even more expensive.

8368 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.FhC5aji14PL.88180@.f28e622/9894 links to 680 postings by gisterme prior to restarting of this thread on March of this year. All these posts are available by date at http://www.mrshowalter.net/calendar1.htm

Each of these links connects to 20 links on the MD thread by gisterme:

8370 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.FhC5aji14PL.88180@.f28e622/9896

8371 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.FhC5aji14PL.88180@.f28e622/9897

8372 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.FhC5aji14PL.88180@.f28e622/9900

8373 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.FhC5aji14PL.88180@.f28e622/9899

8374 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.FhC5aji14PL.88180@.f28e622/9900

8375 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.FhC5aji14PL.88180@.f28e622/9901

8376 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.FhC5aji14PL.88180@.f28e622/9902

8378 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.FhC5aji14PL.88180@.f28e622/9904

8379 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.FhC5aji14PL.88180@.f28e622/9905

All these posts are available, either by links here, or by date at http://www.mrshowalter.net/calendar1.htm

The postings that were removed from this thread yesterday are reposted on Psychwar #381 http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?8@@.ee7a163/414

I think that the references to Milgram's study, from Lecture Notes: Introductory Psychology by Prof. Evan Pritchard http://www.uwinnipeg.ca/~epritch1/social98a.html includes this: are particularly interesting. Those notes also have a succint writeup of Jonestown. Trust can be misplaced.

Psychwar, 375-77 http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?8@@.ee7a163/407

almarst2003 - 01:32pm Feb 26, 2003 EST (# 9307 of 9309)

Amnesty International launches on-line petition for Iraq - http://www.amnesty.org/go/iraq

The population of Iraq is in imminent danger of a human rights and humanitarian catastrophe. Military action could trigger a disaster for the people of Iraq and surrounding countries.

Before it takes any further action, Amnesty International calls upon the UN Security Council to assess the human rights and humanitarian impact on the civilian population of any military action against Iraq.

The assessment should take place in a public session of the Security Council, open to all UN member states, and it must include consideration of:

- the potential effects of military action on the human rights of the Iraqi population. - the effects on the humanitarian situation as Iraqis are already suffering under severe economic sanctions and violations by their government. - the risk that military action would lead to massive numbers of people being forced into flight. - potential grave violations of international humanitarian law, including direct attacks on civilians, the use of human shields and the use of inherently indiscriminate weapons.

Amnesty International urges the Security Council to deploy human rights monitors immediately throughout Iraq to report on human rights abuses by any party.

Join Amnesty International's call. Sign AI's online petition to the President of the Security Council at http://www.amnesty.org/go/iraq before 8 March. Please forward this message to others. Your appeal can make a difference.

More Messages Recent Messages (2 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us