New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (9272 previous messages)

rshow55 - 10:05pm Feb 24, 2003 EST (# 9273 of 9284) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

Some basic questions have to be asked. For example - who is the bully? Who is defending peace, stability, and order?

New European Document Opposes Using Force Against Iraq By ELAINE SCIOLINO http://www.nytimes.com/2003/02/24/international/worldspecial/24CND-FRAN.html

PARIS, Feb. 24 — France, Germany and Russia declared today that a war against Iraq was not justified at this time and that international inspections to rid Iraq of its most dangerous weapons were working.

The declaration seemed intended to counter an American-led plan to introduce a resolution in the Security Council stating that Iraq had not complied with demands that it cooperate fully with weapons inspectors.

The document is also certain to deepen the rift between the United States and Europe over how to force President Saddam Hussein of Iraq to rid his country of the remnants of his nuclear, biological and chemical weapons programs and his ballistic missiles.

If that's what the war is about - who would support it?

I've read a lot of news today - and I'm wondering how to respond, tactfully and constructively - to some things gisterme has said.

The story here ought to raise some questions - especially after the money being paid Turkey.

February 24, 2003 U.S. Officials Push for Iraq Votes By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Filed at 6:45 p.m. ET http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/international/AP-Iraq-Vote-Hunt.html

If "legitimate authorization" is to occur in this way - I have to wonder what legitimate reason France, Russia, and China might have for letting that "legitimate authorization" happen.

I'm out for tonight. Maybe I'll feel more tactful in the morning.

lchic - 10:05pm Feb 24, 2003 EST (# 9274 of 9284)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Which race is 'later' running in?

lchic - 10:07pm Feb 24, 2003 EST (# 9275 of 9284)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

UK | ALLTERNATIVE

Ministers throw down gauntlet on alternative to nuclear

The government yesterday gave the renewable power industry five years to prove it can meet a growing share of Britain's energy needs - in effect leaving the back door open for the stricken nuclear industry to stage a comeback. Green energy companies and environmental groups welcomed ministers' clear determination to meet ambitious targets to cut carbon dioxide emissions by 60% by 2050 without a revival of atomic power.

But they cautioned that the Treasury would have to commit substantially more funds if the industry was to gradually fill the energy gap, and warned that the government's decision to turn its target of 20% of power from renewables by 2020 into a mere "aspiration" would deter investment by the City.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/renewable/Story/0,2763,902458,00.html

lchic - 10:18pm Feb 24, 2003 EST (# 9276 of 9284)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Alternatives ... there are usually alternatives ... and then there's instinct

Human Instinct Will to Win

Genre: Documentary

Host PROFESSOR ROBERT WINSTON reveals how natural chemicals released into the brain makes winning feel so good and losing so bad and why humans instinctively compete only when there's a strong chance of victory, a strategy our ancestors developed to ensure survival. Learn how evolutionary changes to our diet not only fuelled brain growth but also catapulted our competitive instinct into a whole new arena and why brainpower combined with instincts have made up the most successful species on earth. Presented by ROBERT WINSTON.

More Messages Recent Messages (8 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us