New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (9211 previous messages)

lchic - 11:36am Feb 22, 2003 EST (# 9212 of 9220)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Saudi Arabia - execution-er

Saudi Arabia had one of the highest rates of executions in the world, inadequate trial procedures and feeble evidence requirements.

She said it also employed a range of torture techniques to obtain confessions, including beating of the soles of the feet, use of electric shock devices and the extraction of nails.

Cruel judicial punishments - such as amputation - continue to be imposed

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/681597.stm

lchic - 11:46am Feb 22, 2003 EST (# 9213 of 9220)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Fortress America NYT Magazine

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/02/23/magazine/23FORTRESS.html?8hpib

lchic - 12:10pm Feb 22, 2003 EST (# 9214 of 9220)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Brain - problem solving

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/02/17/science/17BRAI.html

lchic - 12:13pm Feb 22, 2003 EST (# 9215 of 9220)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

NK Powell talks with Japan

almarst2003 - 02:14pm Feb 22, 2003 EST (# 9216 of 9220)

"Top CBS executives are deeply concerned that Sunday night's GRAMMY Awards may turn from a celebration of music -- into a giant anti-war political rally

"The CBS executive warned microphones may be unplugged on Sunday night if live performances turn political.

"It, of course, is a final option [to cut the microphone.] But it's a very real option,"

http://www.drudgereport.com/cbs.htm

gisterme - 02:17pm Feb 22, 2003 EST (# 9217 of 9220)

rshow55 - 07:46am Feb 22, 2003 EST (# 9201 of ...) <a href="/webin/WebX?14@28.543FazVa3ug.0@.f28e622/10728">rshow55 2/22/03 7:50am</a>

"...If gisterme is speaking for Bush, he doesn't have the luxury of idealistic stances that can't work..."

Gisterme does not speak for President Bush. However what you say is true of us all. Nobody has the luxury of taking idealistic stances that can't work. Anubody can do that for a while but the consequences are terrible without exception.

A rich fool and his money are soon parted. A powerful fool and his power are also soon parted.

You should seriously consider your own advice, Robert. In my view you're far more in need of that good advice than I am. It's you who appears to be the ideologue here.

More Messages Recent Messages (3 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us