New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (9156 previous messages)

gisterme - 03:18am Feb 21, 2003 EST (# 9157 of 9164)

bbbuck - 12:35am Feb 18, 2003 EST (9059 of...)

http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.DWgdaEvx3Uc.1760605@.f28e622/10585

"...the gulf war, or the reconquering of Kuwait, started, after Saddam Hussein thought he could invade Kuwait and that the world would let him get away with it.

Then he blew up all the oil wells..."

That's pretty much the way I remember it too, bbbuck and you make a good point.

If acquisition of oil resources had been the motivation of that war, then why weren't any oil fields "confiscated"?

As a matter of fact, it was largely through the efforts of private US compnies that the Kuwaiti oil well fires started by Saddam were extinguished. It was Saddam who tried to deprive Kuwait of its primary source of income. Saddam failed in that effort. I wonder why people like almarst never seem to remember such little details?

As I recall, naysayers, including the distinguished Carl Sagan, prior to the firing of the Kuwaiti oil fields, were saying that the fires would burn for decades and would even cause a "nuclear winter" effect if Saddam burned the wells. That's why (they said) Saddam should be allowed to take over Kuwait. They were wrong.

The Gulf War coalition could have easily crushed Saddam back then and occupied Iraqi oil fields. They didn't.

Acquisition of oil resources by foreign nations has never been a primary issue in the friction with Saddam. If it were, those oil fields would have been occupied long ago.

lchic - 03:19am Feb 21, 2003 EST (# 9158 of 9164)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Annual budget for United Nations is ....

Annual budget for USA war-wartoys-warmongering .......

Gisterme --- the figures here please!

lchic - 03:21am Feb 21, 2003 EST (# 9159 of 9164)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

MONOPOLY - not Mayfair ... OIL WELLS

seems the USA got oil wells from Briton after WWII

and the USA is going to give the KURDS OIL WELLS to TURKEY .... post Iraq-bash

and when Kurdistan was split-up in 1922 ... it did want to reform as the Kurdistan Nation ...

now if Turkey have their oil ....

what chance do they have?

lchic - 03:23am Feb 21, 2003 EST (# 9160 of 9164)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

GU Talk "" Filthy Warmongering Repugnicans are Destroying the Earth and Making the Whole World A Potential Warzone!!!

http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?50@@.4a90cc9a/0

gisterme - 03:24am Feb 21, 2003 EST (# 9161 of 9164)

almarst2002 - 07:01am Feb 18, 2003 EST (9063 of...) <a href="/webin/WebX?14@28.DWgdaEvx3Uc.1760605@.f28e622/10590">almarst2002 2/18/03 7:01am</a>

"Some people exist in a different "dimensions"..."

Hmmm. What different dimensions do you exist in, almarst?

lchic - 03:27am Feb 21, 2003 EST (# 9162 of 9164)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Who ever helped someone by carpet bombing them?!

    a gem from the above thread (post 24)

lchic - 03:29am Feb 21, 2003 EST (# 9163 of 9164)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Almast exists in the cyber dimension

More Messages Recent Messages (1 following message)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us