New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (9054 previous messages)

rshow55 - 09:08pm Feb 17, 2003 EST (# 9055 of 9055) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md01000s/md1039.htm http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md01000s/md1439.htm http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md01000s/md1632.htm http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md01000s/md1840.htm http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md2000s/md2008.htm http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md2000s/md2064.htm http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md2000s/md2914.htm http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md6000s/md6932.htm http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md8000s/md8293.htm http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md8000s/md8331.htm http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_new_0100s/md175n.htm http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_new_0100s/md469n.htm

5252 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.YC4raLrb3vk.1169969@.f28e622/6599

"I think that conditions are ripening for getting something like this done. Some leaders of nation states involved (not necessarily all of them) would need to want it done -- and would need to let that be known, to people who had resources that mattered for the effort.

_ _ _ _ _

Today, much more discussion of terrorism, and relations between other nations and the Islamic nations, would need to be considered, as well.

The motivations for this sort of thing are getting greater - because problems are getting clearer - and people are getting good sense enough to know fear - and concern.

Things need to be sorted out - and we could do a lot better than we're doing.

Most of the staff that would be needed to do that work could be found - with funding - in news organizations from all over the world. Focusing on facts would not be particularly difficult - with reasonable umpiring - and the multiple crosschecking now available with the internet.

We know enough to do much better than we're now doing. Much of what we know, that could be useful - has already been posted on this thread by lchic .

Some of the facts about missile defense - and the enormous waste and deception involved in that boondoggle - would be useful things to review - because - with an insistence on taking "connection of the dots" to an umpired closure - for all to see - there isn't any question how much deception has been involved in that crucial part of the military-industrial complex's efforts.

We're in a situation now where, if we faced the truth - in enough detail for reasonable decisions - every reasonable security need of every country on the Security Council could be much better met than today.

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense


Enter your response, then click the POST MY MESSAGE button below.
See the
quick-edit help for more information.

Message:






Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us