New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (9000 previous messages)

rshow55 - 01:35pm Feb 16, 2003 EST (# 9001 of 9013) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

And people are responsible for what happens - for what their systems do.

Antiwar Marches Reveal Gulf Between Leaders and People By ALAN COWELL http://www.nytimes.com/2003/02/16/international/europe/16CND-BLAIR.html

LONDON, Feb. 16 — The drive toward war with Iraq has produced many divisions along the way — between the United States and Europe, and within Europe itself. But as millions across this divided continent marched on Saturday to demand peace, a further, sharp rift widened, not across continents, but within nations, between ruler and ruled.

And in the process the political lines shifted from an almost legalistic argument at the United Nations about the evidence justifying Saddam Hussein's disarmament to a more visceral debate here about the justness of the war, and the moral legitimacy of those prepared to either fight or oppose it.

Significantly, the biggest demonstrations on Saturday were reported from those European nations whose governments sided with the United States against France and Germany in an open letter two weeks ago.

If leaders started asking questions that they are expected to ask - and got some facts straight - a great deal could sort out.

7000-7002 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@93.a229aP3zYzn^397117@.f28e622/8521

Someday At Christmas by Stevie Wonder http://www.webfitz.com/lyrics/Lyrics/xmas/97xmas.html expresses wonderful ideals - and is a great thing to read.

Maybe someday soon - if we keep our heads, and work at it. We ought to think hard about the things that stand in the way of much better human results than we have now.

lchic - 03:32pm Feb 16, 2003 EST (# 9002 of 9013)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Mulgabe - Commonwealth - Howard (Aus)

Howard says it's up to the ZIM-PEOPLE to put their government back on course

Yet

He's not saying the same for Iraq nor NK

rshow55 - 03:56pm Feb 16, 2003 EST (# 9003 of 9013) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

In 8979 <a href="/webin/WebX?14@28.mvu6a2Wp39l.968701@.f28e622/10505">rshow55 2/16/03 6:17am</a> I posted this:

I've been working on Guardian threads since June 2000, and on the NYT Missile Defense thread since September 25, 2000 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.mvu6a2Wp39l.968701@.f28e622/2006 where I had an all-day meeting on the web with an authoritative figure.

A recounting of what the Missile Defense thread has done since then is set out in Psychwar, Casablanca - - and terror from #151 http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/159 on. Links before March 1, 2002 are no longer on this thread, but I'll be providing accessible links to the summaries from #151-156 today.

I was asked to post on the missile defense thread by KateNYT - and it was clear that my primary interest at the time was nuclear disarmament. There's been a great deal of work on missile defense proper on this thread, as well, reviewed at #84 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.mvu6a2Wp39l.968701@.f28e622/99 - and with many links to one aspect - the ABL system - at 8956-8959 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.mvu6a2Wp39l.968701@.f28e622/10482 - - I'm proud of the technical work on missile defense - but the thread has been more focused on issues of peace and nuclear disarmament. Perhaps there's a moral - that might perhaps interest KateNYT - as expressed by Verlyn Klinkenborg in Accepting the Weather December 26, 2002

The one thing I do remember is this: you have to be careful where you dump the season's first tractor-bucket full of snow because that's where all the rest of the plowed snow - a mountain of it - will inevitably go. . . .

Here is a summary of postings, from March 1, 2001, in six parts.

More Messages Recent Messages (10 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us