New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (8094 previous messages)

lchic - 10:06am Jan 26, 2003 EST (# 8095 of 8102)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Showalter and Johnson have met in the flesh.

Johnson 'posing in character' has spoken to Showalter on the phone.

Johnson is a writer

Writers develop characters

The Characters exist within defined boundaries with defined viewpoints

The Characters appear to be real, to have life, to BE

Yet they are fictions

Spotting the fictions is something most readers of the NYT won't do ---- they'll assume that each moniker is a distinct 'reader/poster' ....

Johnston brought this board's attention here :

Creation/Evolution thread

Chemist99A - 09:56pm Jan 7, 2003 EST (# 13544 of 14293)

Following this post are numerous by the multimonikered George ... working to ascertain the scope of the guy's complaint ...

an interesting senario - examples

dccougar - 10:15pm Jan 7, 2003 EST (# 13545 of 14293)

wrcooper - 10:20pm Jan 7, 2003 EST (# 13547 of 14293)

dccougar - 10:26pm Jan 7, 2003 EST (# 13548 of 14293)

jorian315 - 09:22am Jan 8, 2003 EST (# 13563 of 14293)

gisterme - 10:11am Jan 26, 2003 EST (# 8096 of 8102)

commondata - 04:18am Jan 26, 2003 EST (# 8060...)

"...it's no surprise to hear you mindlessly link AQ and Iraq..."

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/10/01/attack/main523963.shtml

http://www.cnn.com/2002/US/09/25/us.iraq.alqaeda/

"...Rice said the U.S. government clearly knows "that there were in the past and have been contacts between senior Iraqi officials and members of al Qaeda going back for actually quite a long time."

"High ranking detainees, have said that Iraq provided some training to al Qaeda in chemical weapons development," Rice said.

"So, yes, there are contacts between Iraq and al Qaeda. We know that Saddam Hussein has a long history with terrorism in general. And there are some al Qaeda personnel who found refuge in Baghdad," she said. "There clearly are contacts between al Qaeda and Iraq that can be documented."

At the same time, she cautioned that "no one is trying to make an argument at this point that Saddam Hussein somehow had operational control of what happened on September 11th, so we don't want to push this too far."

Rice added: "This is a story that is unfolding, and it is getting clear, and we're learning more. ... When the picture is clear, we'll make full disclosure about it."

If I pushed the AQ-Iraq link "too far" for your sensibilities in the post you referenced, commondata, well that's just too bad. We'll both survive somehow. I'd bet that there will be a lot more information about this soon though. We'll see.

"...Surely it would be more rational to complain about the billion dollars worth of US arms sales to Saudi Arabia annually; didn't that perverse and abhorrent system produce 15 of the 19 hijackers?..."

The Madrassa system tolerated (if not supported) by the secular Saudi Government did produce those fifteen. If Iraq ceases to be a threat to Saudi Arabia, perhaps the Saudis won't need to buy so many arms. We can hope.

lchic - 10:12am Jan 26, 2003 EST (# 8097 of 8102)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Here's a GU thread critical of NYT

Guardian Talk / International / Why does The New York Times suck? (in your opinion)

http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?230@@.3ba7a0a1!skip=47
    There're many examples of how "the paper of record" has skewed the news over the years. This forum is created for the purpose of detailing the involved deception that's very much covered up in American mainstream media. Of related note is the Guardian Forum entitled THE NEW YORK TIMES FORUMS ARE THE MOST CENSORED, located in the Politics/Europe & the World section.
Spot the monikers!

lchic - 10:22am Jan 26, 2003 EST (# 8098 of 8102)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

"Even those who sit at the right hand, help him govern with fear, are not safe ....

If i defect he will kill my son ...

Not only i help Saddam Hussain --- Britain helped him --- America helped him ..... "

Iraqi talking with Alan Little bbc

Seems the mercyless Saddam is a Frankenstein created, given breath and scope, by the misguided ... who'll and does kill anyone who even 'thinks' of 'free will'

So on a HUMAN RIGHTS level he's a candidate for removal .... but .... people don't want civillian casualties.

The USA may be perceived to be a power that hasn't always followed through on promises --- leaving civillians who change tack vulnerable to Saddam's sword.

_____

On the home front the USA government isn't proactive --- rather leaves important matters to be slowly fought through the courts ... example ... the sniper case --- lawyers are looking as to why the guns used were stolen and available ....

On the international front ... the USA has failed to show leadership to improve matters related to international improvement - Greenhouse Gas is one example.

More Messages Recent Messages (4 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Email to Sysop  Your Preferences  Logout

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us