New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(8059 previous messages)
commondata
- 04:18am Jan 26, 2003 EST (#
8060 of 8072)
Gisterme: I read an article a couple of days ago about
some European anti-war folks who are travelling to Iraq to
volunteer to Saddam Hussein to be his human shields. Can't
find the link.
It's been a big story here in the UK. They left in a convoy
of buses from London Bridge and will pick up hundreds more
protesters on the way to Baghdad. The interviews that I saw
some of them give impressed me immensely; they're articulate,
motivated by the best of reasons, they condemn Saddam, they
have lots of cameras and, in the bright London sunshine,
seemed willing to die. They're a propaganda nightmare for
Blair and Bush and I applaud them.
They're racists! They think that by being "superior" to
their brown brothers they will somehow be able to prevent a
war.
You're reliably predictably wrong and they've got your
measure. You said two posts back "I've never killed or
maimed anyone and don't want to see anyone get killed or
maimed, especially my fellow Americans. So, if
there are a bunch of Americans taking tea in a presidential
palace, would you be more or less likely to bomb it?
I read a couple of weeks ago that a poll revealed that 50%
of Americans now believe that Iraq was actually responsible
for downing the twin towers so it's no surprise to hear you
mindlessly link AQ and Iraq. Surely it would be more rational
to complain about the billion dollars worth of US arms sales
to Saudi Arabia annually; didn't that perverse and abhorrent
system produce 15 of the 19 hijackers?
A big difference between me and thee, Robert, is that
I'll back up any difinitve statements that I make. If I'm
spectulating, just saying what I think or expressing my
opinion I say that too. You have to admit that most of what I
say holds far more appeal to common sense than what you
say.
I laughed out loud when I read that. The myths I often hear
you espouse are those of the dominant US tribe and are always
presented without analysis or justification. You're religious
(blind faith in your government's fairy stories) and lazy. Why
not present your evidence for the link between AQ and Iraq? As
you so often use that as a reason for war, I'd say you have an
obligation.
commondata
- 04:29am Jan 26, 2003 EST (#
8061 of 8072)
'Human shields' head for Iraq
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/2693289.stm
commondata
- 04:35am Jan 26, 2003 EST (#
8062 of 8072)
A second convoy is planning to leave on 15
February, when up to 600 people are expected to fill a
further six double-decker buses.
If you go to war, Gisterme, you're going to end up wiping
out half of the English Home Counties. Now, that's news in
these parts!
commondata
- 04:56am Jan 26, 2003 EST (#
8063 of 8072)
Missing gene 'increases aggression'
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/2692299.stm
Has the U.S. bred out its PET-1s?
lchic
- 05:22am Jan 26, 2003 EST (#
8064 of 8072) ~~~~ It got understood and exposed
~~~~
Double Deckers ---- Cliff started it http://home3.ecore.net/reneschubert/422.html
lchic
- 05:32am Jan 26, 2003 EST (#
8065 of 8072) ~~~~ It got understood and exposed
~~~~
Gisterme (who thinks he knows who he is) says Saddam must
be Ousted.
Commondata says ..
Showalter says ... the USA conditions put on the UN by the
USA have been met by Iraq.
(A war without justification may bounce-legal international
law).
Almarst says ... Iraq has debts to pay - pay the debt
without disturbance .. damn it ... PAY THE DEBT!
Limpseed says --- who are these posters? Limpseed you'd
have a higher chance of response if you asked for their sperm
count! Bare in mind that the moniker may sometimes be, and at
other times, represent the mind-behind the moniker .... have
you got that George?
(7 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|