New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (8025 previous messages)

rshow55 - 09:42am Jan 25, 2003 EST (# 8026 of 8040) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

Here is a list of Mohammed's wives and concubines , according to the Muslim scholar Ali Dashti.

1. Khadija b. Khuwailid (died 1st)

2. Sawda/Sauda bint Zam’a

3. ‘Aisha/’A’isha/Aesha (8-9 yrs old)

4. Omm/Umm Salama/Salaim

5. Hafsa ¾ slaves / concubines ¾

6. Zaynab/Zainab bint Jahsh

7. Jowayriya / Juwairiya (captive)

8. Omm/Umm Habiba ¾ uncertain relationship

9. Safiya/Saffiya b. Huyai (captive)

10. Maymuna/Maimuna of Hareth

11. Fatima/Fatema

12. Hend/Hind )widow)

13. Asma of Saba

14. Zaynab of Khozayma

15. Habla

16. Asma of Noman

17. Mary the Christian

18. Rayhana

19. Omm Sharik

20. Maimuna

21. Zaynab/Zainab 3rd

22. Khawla

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=mohammed+and+wives&btnG=Google+Search

http://www.angelfire.com/on/ummiby1/muh4.html

http://www.angelfire.com/on/ummiby1/wives1.html

http://www.angelfire.com/on/ummiby1/wives2.html

http://www.angelfire.com/on/ummiby1/wives2.html

http://www.angelfire.com/on/ummiby1/wives2.html

rshow55 - 09:44am Jan 25, 2003 EST (# 8027 of 8040) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

In 7952 I wrote this - and gisterme has dismissed what I said in 8009. He did so in a way that I believe pinpoints terrible mistakes that the Bush administration is making.

Since I don't have html links to this thread, I'm reposting the first part of my 7952

"At a time where a great many people in many nations, including many in the Bush administration - are working hard for peaceful accomodations of difficult and significant problems, this is a superbly clear and important piece.

I think that it gets to the core of a problem that needs to be solved - and a nexus of misunderstandings that need to be adressed.

Why We Know Iraq Is Lying By CONDOLEEZZA RICE http://www.nytimes.com/2003/01/23/opinion/23RICE.html

"Instead of implementing national initiatives to disarm, Iraq maintains institutions whose sole purpose is to thwart the work of the inspectors. "

" Is that the purpose of these institutions? Or are these institutions, clumsy and ugly as they may be - set up to defend primary interests of Islamic culture - as it now is in Iraq, with the compromises in place? The issue is important - central, I think, to the problems we face with Iraq - and have had over a decade where a nation that shows some bureaucratic competence has been firing off air-air missiles without turning on guidance radars.

"That is a message that we should, it seems to me -have read as a message, rather than a "simple" mistake.

"There are problems here involving two extremely touchy subjects -- sex and religion. And, in the Islamic case, some fundamental interactions between sex and religion where the Islamic world is very different from the West.

"Win-win solutions to the North Korean mess are well underway, it seems to me. That's because the problems, difficult as they are - are reasonably well understood.

"To get win-win solutions to the messes in or involving the Middle East - Iraq, the Palestinian-Israeli tragedy, and Islamic terrorism - we need to have some things understood.

"I'm hesitating a good deal before going more deeply into this subject matter - but hope I can collect my courage and logic enough to do it well - because the core problems in the Middle East involve sex and religion - in ways that have gone very badly, in human terms, for a long time. Solutions that work have to make aesthetic, moral and practical sense to the real people and nations involved.

More Messages Recent Messages (13 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Email to Sysop  Your Preferences  Logout

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us