New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(7813 previous messages)
rshow55
- 03:54pm Jan 19, 2003 EST (#
7814 of 7819)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click
"rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for
on this thread.
Stresses are high:
U.N. Inspectors Pressing Baghdad for Better
Cooperation By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/international/AP-Iraq.html
BAGHDAD, Iraq (AP) -- Weapons inspectors
pressed for full Iraqi cooperation in more than two hours of
talks with government officials Sunday, and reported ``some
progress'' in what they called a last-ditch effort to avoid
war.
It seems to me that there's been a lot of progress, even
so. Here are repeats of some past postings of mine that seem
to me to fit here.
rshow55
- 03:56pm Jan 19, 2003 EST (#
7815 of 7819)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click
"rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for
on this thread.
rshow55 - 05:37pm Dec 26, 2002 EST (# 7058
"I think there's time and reason for talking before
fighting.
rshow55 10/20/02 10:20pm includes this:
"Perhaps things are going very well, and
international discussions are going well. If you take Iraq
at its word, subject to checking that if offers - - we are a
long way from a justification for war.
"and includes these references:
. Iraq States Its Case By MOHAMMED
ALDOURI http://www.nytimes.com/2002/10/17/opinion/17ALDO.html
. Iraq Announces Amnesty for Its
Prisoners By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/international/AP-Iraq.html
. Mobs Virtually Empty Iraq's Prisons
By JOHN F. BURNS http://www.nytimes.com/2002/10/21/international/middleeast/21IRAQ.html
" If Iraq can effectively reintegrate those
prisoners, it will show a distinct "regime change" in the
ways that matter to many, many people.
"Those words still seem right to me. I don't have to doubt
that Saddam has done some very ugly things. Has some things
backwards. All the same - efforts to make accomodations for
peace have been real and substantial. It seems to me that
we're a long way from having a justification for war - unless
we do a lot more checking, and a lot more talking, than we
have.
"There could be mistakes on both sides - and there could
still be plenty of room for solutions that were consistent
with every reasonable and reasonably balanced public interest
of any nation involved. I think it is possible that the Bush
administration has made some misjudgements.
"One reason is that I think gisterme has some connections
with the Bush administration - and here is a judgement of his
that might misjudge the relationships between Bin Laden and
Saddam:
_______________
gisterme - 03:35pm Dec 31, 2001 EST (#10594
lchic 12/31/01 1:13am
"...The hand maiden of Bin Laden (the spoilt
rich brat) was seeking revenge in relation to '67..."
" Not trying to refute your point here,
lchic, but it's interesting that Al Quaida had very little
to say about Israel and the Palestinean situation until
after 9/11. Previously OBL's primary justification for his
blood-lust was more Iraq-related. Specifically, his gripe
was the presence of "infidels" on Saudi "holy ground" since
the slapping-down of Saddam during the Gulf War. Hmmm.
Personally I think OBL and Al Quaida are proxies created via
exploitation of the islamist movement to allow Saddam to
pursue vengance for defeat in that war.
_______
"If gisterme is close to GWB - and had this judgement at
that time - might that have biased internal intelligence
estimates? Personally, I sometimes worry that people in the US
government hesitate a great deal before crossing GWB, and go
way out of their way to try to please him.
As of course they should. But is could lead to
misjudgements. Maybe bloody ones.
Judgements on missile defense, or Korean diplomacy, might
be less than perfect, too.
And we know that Kim and Saddam fall way short of
perfection.
(4 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|