New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(7658 previous messages)
rshow55
- 10:13am Jan 15, 2003 EST (#
7659 of 7679)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click
"rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for
on this thread.
I misspoke - I intended "f*ck" - - which is often softend
idiomatically to phrases like "to f*rt around with"
- back after breakfast - just looked in for a few seconds.
rshow55
- 11:37am Jan 15, 2003 EST (#
7660 of 7679)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click
"rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for
on this thread.
Commondata, I appreciate your point of view, in many ways -
but I choose not to close with you, or fight with you - just
now. I'll try to later - if it seems right. But right now, to
close with you would be disorderly, unsymmetric, and
disorderly from points of view I've been working on. I don't
have the luxury of explosive indignation. Whatever the US does
- it has to be the US doing it, and the Bush administration
doing it - and stances predictated on detestation of the
United States aren't helpful.
7645 <a
href="/webin/WebX?14@93.cNfJajEw0tf^302050@.f28e622/9169">rshow55
1/14/03 6:19pm</a> includes this:
"We need to take time - and there is time.
We need to have enough different lines of communication that
ambiguous or muddled or stupid messages can be identified to
reasoable probability.
. U.N. Chief Says It Is Too Early to
Consider War With Iraq By JULIA PRESTON http://www.nytimes.com/2003/01/14/international/middleeast/14CND-NATI.html
"I disagree formally - Annan is using words
awkwardly. It is certainly time to think HARD about war with
Iraq - in many, many ways - every which way - so we can
learn enough to avoid it.
I stand by every word of that. I believe that Annan,
reading my text, would have read it as support of the
objectives he was pursuing.
Things are difficult. For the United States, for the
UN, for North Korea, for Iraq, and for other nations of the
world from many points of view.
Wizard's Chess http://www.nytimes.com/2003/01/05/opinion/05SUN1.html
Right now the world must seem like a
potentially deadly game of three-dimensional chess to the
the Bush administration.
It looks to me like a potentially deadly "game" that is at
a dangerous stage, but that looks to me like it can be shaping
up to solutions that save many, many, many lives - both by
avoiding unnecessary deaths - and by permitting better lives.
I think the diplomats who actually have to speak and act are
acting and speaking pretty carefully - and in many ways well.
Korea has some things backward - but is moderating its
rhetoric to a significant extent. I hope people are patient -
and that moving toward Bush's excellent proposals can be done
in much smaller steps - and enough of them so that
Korea and the US have a reasonable chance of making an
agreement. Steps that are too large - even if they suggest
superb endpoints - are usually unstable in a highly charged
situation. The same end point - achieved after a series of
smaller steps - can be very stable. I think Bush's
proposal was excellent - but it will have to serve as an
objective to be reached in small and oscillatory steps.
North Korea Calls Offer of U.S. Talks 'Deceptive
Drama' By REUTERS Filed at 10:50 a.m. ET http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/international/international-korea-north.html
When two enemies are "feeling each other out" - treachery
and peacemaking look alike - and under these
circumstances, elements of "deceptive drama" are not only
understandable - they can be necessary. From where they are -
both N. Korea and the US may be doing things pretty right,
just now - if they remember that some fights - about
"principles" can be unresolvable - when the things that
matter can be entirely satisfactory to both sides.
(19 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|