New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times
Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Campaigns
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (7469 previous messages)

lunarchick - 12:22am Jan 8, 2003 EST (# 7470 of 7479)

Oprah Winfrey (talk show host) had a program on Iraq

Looking at her face - she was uneasy - tense

Usually she's happy bouncy - fun

Not that day

A couple of guys on the show were 'very comfortable' they could play and weave with prospective death - happily

Yet Oprah just didn't look comfortable that day - why? She didn't say.

gisterme - 12:39am Jan 8, 2003 EST (# 7471 of 7479)

fredmoore 1/7/03 3:55am

"...Keep on posting ... and ... hey, my post is more relevamt to MD than 99% of 'what else lurks beneath the MD banner'..."

No, doubt about that, fred. Here's why

gisterme 1/5/03 4:36pm

lunarchick - 12:48am Jan 8, 2003 EST (# 7472 of 7479)

... and for a pitch fork ... first losing your bales and then being deshafted ....

great logic you guys

Keep feeding those bats!

bbbuck - 12:57am Jan 8, 2003 EST (# 7473 of 7479)
"You can't eat this, it's people, it's people"-B....."What about the cherry pie?"

Hey if anyone is interested on 'Creation and Evolution' chemist99a lost his job, and appears to be accusing a fellow forumite (cantabb) of somehow causing it.
I was going to post a question to chemist99a and ask him how he thinks cantabb could have accomplished this, but I chickened out.
Still I thought it interesting how a person could lose a job he's held for 20 years and then blame an 'anonymous' poster for perhaps causing this job loss.

Luckily I own no bats, but thanks for the pet healthcare tip, luuney-bat-chick.

gisterme - 12:57am Jan 8, 2003 EST (# 7474 of 7479)

rshow55 1/7/03 7:19pm

"...Something unexpected went wrong, in a sequence that looked otherwise like it was very right..."

That seems to happen to you a lot, Robert.

"...I'm "going around in circles"..."

Wow! That's exactly the same thing that happens when you yoke up an ox alongside an ass! About the only thing that lash-up is good for is making crop circles. :-)

lunarchick - 02:13am Jan 8, 2003 EST (# 7475 of 7479)

Don't post on C&E - if i did reChem99 i'd say

    Job security is an illusion.
    A linear look at the functionings of an HR dept would be insightful.
    What's their true mission?
    When, where and how does an employee fall short?
    Consider redundancy v updateness.
    Look at the direction of the entity.
    Isn't this the same world that used to fire women the moment their bodies became creative and started to evolve.
    America - you're standing in it!
Who in their right-mind would dabble in C&E when it's E not C ....

lunarchick - 02:25am Jan 8, 2003 EST (# 7476 of 7479)

Gisteme posts more crumbs from the floor .. gisterme 1/8/03 12:57am ... rather than engage at a higher conceptual level.

    Showalter don't spend too much time tit-tatting with Gisterme .. the board doesn't have an html central gutter-space command - to sit Question opposite answer ... it all just starts to merge and swim when S&G get down to the crumby bits ... the whole cake (big picture) is where it's at!
    Is it?
    Most often?
    Usually?
    Sometimes?
    The crumbs are important .....
    they connect like dots ...
    to make whole cakes ....
    with different ingredients ....
    Ordered Cakes
    Symmetrical Cakes with butterfly wings
    Harmonious Cakes
    But you can't have your cake and eat it
    Cream Cakes
    in your face
    Egg " "
    Missed-American Pie
So if war with Iraq could be substituded with a cream-cake throw-in between Bush (and brother Jeb) & Saddam .. Winner takes all ... the oil

Would we get to Arabic-Liberty with Democracy faster?

More Messages Recent Messages (3 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us