New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times
Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Campaigns
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (7413 previous messages)

lunarchick - 08:21am Jan 6, 2003 EST (# 7414 of 7418)

The UN have compiled a report on child soldiers - naming and shaming those who shackle them.

lunarchick - 08:26am Jan 6, 2003 EST (# 7415 of 7418)

US determined to put $10b into Israel .... even though they say it won't be used to, it will be used, further humiliate Palestinians.

A TALK-Fest in London that had invited Palestinians didn't get their visitors ... Israel does not like 'talk' ...

lunarchick - 08:35am Jan 6, 2003 EST (# 7416 of 7418)

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/talking_point/default.stm

lunarchick - 09:01am Jan 6, 2003 EST (# 7417 of 7418)

http://news.bbc.co.uk/

gisterme - 11:38am Jan 6, 2003 EST (# 7418 of 7418)

manjumicha 1/6/03 1:45am

"...Chinese and Russians have dealt with NKs for centuries and know how NKs have bled the empire of the days..."

Umm, NK has only existed as a separate politcal entity since a little after WWII. Centuries, manju? I think you'd better give some credit to the rest of the Koreans if you want to make that claim...and the rest of the Koreans don't seem to be interested in starvation. South Korea is a regional economic power. Seems to me like they've got thier act together a lot better than the NKs. Of course that's not because of the NK people. It's because of the NK government.

"...That is why they [Russia, China, Japan] are staying out of this fight..."

What fight??? Russia, China and Japan are definately not staying out of efforts to make Kim Jong Il come to his senses. I just hope he decides to join the world one of the days, for his own people's sake.

"...their strategic interests will be best served if NK and US keep duking it out..."

I hope Kim Jong Il doesn't think he's "duking it out" with anybody right now. He isn't doing anything but boxing with his own shadow. He should be figuring out a way to join the world instead. His people haven't done anything to deserve a war. What they deserve is some prosperity, like all the other nations around them have managed to achieve.

"...the end result will be much diminished US influence and power in NE Asia..."

Well, the way to get US troops out of South Korea has always been for North Korea to stop threatening it. The US will not abandon SK so long as the SKs are threatened by the north and want our help. After all, it costs US taxpayers about $3 billion per year to do our part in protecting SK from it's neighbor. A lot of that money diffuses into the SK economy. From a more selfish point of view, I'm sure that money would be far better spent if it were infused into our own economy.

One thing is for sure though. The Cold War is over. The Korean War was a Cold War battle. The Cold War was about containing communist imperialism not necessarily about destroying communism. In case you haven't noticed, relations between China, a communist nation, and the west have warmed tremendously and are continuing to improve since the end of the Cold War. That's because the Chinese are not acting like imperialists or threatening their non-communist neighbors. China has joined the world. It is experiencing very good economic growth in sectors of industry that are beneficial to it's poeple. I doubt that China will withdraw from that for the sake of Kim Jong Il. It is in China's best strategic interest to see a stable and prosperous NK...not one that wants to bring war to the region.

"...you are too dumb to see it, gisterme...."

It must be so if you say it, manju. ;-)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense


Enter your response, then click the POST MY MESSAGE button below.
See the
quick-edit help for more information.






Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us