New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(7413 previous messages)
lunarchick
- 08:21am Jan 6, 2003 EST (#
7414 of 7418)
The UN have compiled a report on child soldiers - naming
and shaming those who shackle them.
lunarchick
- 08:26am Jan 6, 2003 EST (#
7415 of 7418)
US determined to put $10b into Israel .... even though they
say it won't be used to, it will be used, further humiliate
Palestinians.
A TALK-Fest in London that had invited Palestinians didn't
get their visitors ... Israel does not like 'talk' ...
lunarchick
- 08:35am Jan 6, 2003 EST (#
7416 of 7418)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/talking_point/default.stm
lunarchick
- 09:01am Jan 6, 2003 EST (#
7417 of 7418)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/
gisterme
- 11:38am Jan 6, 2003 EST (#
7418 of 7418)
manjumicha
1/6/03 1:45am
"...Chinese and Russians have dealt with NKs for
centuries and know how NKs have bled the empire of the
days..."
Umm, NK has only existed as a separate politcal entity
since a little after WWII. Centuries, manju? I think
you'd better give some credit to the rest of the Koreans if
you want to make that claim...and the rest of the Koreans
don't seem to be interested in starvation. South Korea is a
regional economic power. Seems to me like they've got thier
act together a lot better than the NKs. Of course that's not
because of the NK people. It's because of the NK government.
"...That is why they [Russia, China, Japan] are
staying out of this fight..."
What fight??? Russia, China and Japan are definately
not staying out of efforts to make Kim Jong Il come to
his senses. I just hope he decides to join the world one of
the days, for his own people's sake.
"...their strategic interests will be best served if NK
and US keep duking it out..."
I hope Kim Jong Il doesn't think he's "duking it out" with
anybody right now. He isn't doing anything but boxing with his
own shadow. He should be figuring out a way to join the world
instead. His people haven't done anything to deserve a war.
What they deserve is some prosperity, like all the other
nations around them have managed to achieve.
"...the end result will be much diminished US influence
and power in NE Asia..."
Well, the way to get US troops out of South Korea has
always been for North Korea to stop threatening it. The US
will not abandon SK so long as the SKs are threatened by the
north and want our help. After all, it costs US taxpayers
about $3 billion per year to do our part in protecting SK from
it's neighbor. A lot of that money diffuses into the SK
economy. From a more selfish point of view, I'm sure that
money would be far better spent if it were infused into our
own economy.
One thing is for sure though. The Cold War is over. The
Korean War was a Cold War battle. The Cold War was about
containing communist imperialism not necessarily about
destroying communism. In case you haven't noticed, relations
between China, a communist nation, and the west have warmed
tremendously and are continuing to improve since the end of
the Cold War. That's because the Chinese are not acting like
imperialists or threatening their non-communist neighbors.
China has joined the world. It is experiencing very good
economic growth in sectors of industry that are beneficial to
it's poeple. I doubt that China will withdraw from that for
the sake of Kim Jong Il. It is in China's best strategic
interest to see a stable and prosperous NK...not one that
wants to bring war to the region.
"...you are too dumb to see it, gisterme...."
It must be so if you say it, manju. ;-)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
Enter your response, then click the POST MY
MESSAGE button below. See the quick-edit
help for more information.
|